1986
DOI: 10.1121/1.394324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of three acoustic modifications derived from clear speech for improving consonant recognition by young and elderly normal-hearing subjects. Percent-correct nonsense syllable recognition was measured for four stimulus sets: unmodified stimuli; stimuli with consonant duration increased by 100%; stimuli with consonant-vowel ratio increased by 10 dB; and stimuli with both consonant duration and consonant-vowel ratio increased. Analyses of overall nonsense sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a consonant identification task in a set of nonsense CV/VCV syllables, consonant intelligibility has been found to increase in a background of noise when their intensity relative to that of vowels was enhanced (Gordon-Salant, 1986;Hazan and Simpson, 1998;Skowronski and Harris, 2006). Hazan and Simpson (1998) reported significant improvement by applying amplitude enhancement to the formant transition regions at vowel onset and offset as well as the perceptually-important spectral regions of consonants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a consonant identification task in a set of nonsense CV/VCV syllables, consonant intelligibility has been found to increase in a background of noise when their intensity relative to that of vowels was enhanced (Gordon-Salant, 1986;Hazan and Simpson, 1998;Skowronski and Harris, 2006). Hazan and Simpson (1998) reported significant improvement by applying amplitude enhancement to the formant transition regions at vowel onset and offset as well as the perceptually-important spectral regions of consonants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…greater discrimination between vowel categories) has also been shown to benefit speech intelligibility (Bond and Moore, 1994;Ferguson and Kewley-Port, 2002). In the presence of noise, Gordon-Salant (1986) and Hazan and Simpson (1998) found that enhancement of consonant-to-vowel (C/V) amplitude ratio by 10 dB increased intelligibility by up to 10 percentage points. It has also been reported that the fine-grained acoustic-phonetic consequences of precision of articulation are able to affect speech intelligibility in noise (Bond and Moore, 1994;Hazan and Simpson, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consonants /t, k/ are voiceless sounds, occurring about 50 [ms] before the onset of voicing while /d, g/ have a VOT <20 [ms]. Gordon-Salant (1986) approached the question of primary acoustic features by increasing the consonant to vowel energy ratio. The tests were performed on young and old listeners, using real speech at an SNR of þ6 [dB] and at 75 and 90 [dB-SPL], with 19 consonants and three vowels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found age-related decrements in consonant identification when consonants are presented in nonsense syllables [8,12,15,18]. However, Dubno et al found no overall age-related changes in word recognition in audiometrically matched subjects ranging in age from 55 to 84 yr, suggesting that agerelated deficits in consonant identification may not be evident for lexically meaningful tokens [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A number of studies have suggested that phonological processing in noise is impaired by advancing age [12][13][14]. For example, Gelfand et al used the City University of New York Nonsense Syllable Test to examine consonant discrimination in younger and older subjects with audiometric thresholds better than 25 dB at 250 to 8,000 Hz [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%