Recognition of H2AK119ub plays an important role in RSF1-regulated early Xenopus development

Abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are key regulators of gene expression and developmental programs via covalent modification of histones, but the factors that interpret histone modification marks to regulate embryogenesis are less studied. We previously identified Remodeling and Spacing Factor 1 (RSF1) as a reader of histone H2A lysine 119 ubiquitination (H2AK119ub), the histone mark deposited by Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1). In the current study, we used Xenopus laevis as a model to investigate how RSF1 affects early embryonic development and whether recognition of H2AK119ub is important for the function of RSF1. We showed that knockdown of Xenopus RSF1, rsf1, not only induced gastrulation defects as reported previously, but specific targeted knockdown in prospective neural precursors induced neural and neural crest defects, with reductions of marker genes. In addition, similar to knockdown of PRC1 components in Xenopus, the anterior-posterior neural patterning was affected in rsf1 knockdown embryos. Binding of H2AK119ub appeared to be crucial for rsf1 function, as a construct with deletion of the UAB domain, which is required for RSF1 to recognize the H2AK119ub nucleosomes, failed to rescue rsf1 morphant embryos and was less effective in interfering with early Xenopus development when ectopically expressed. Furthermore, ectopic deposition of H2AK119ub on the Smad2 target gene gsc using a ring1a-smad2 fusion protein led to ectopic recruitment of RSF1. The fusion protein was inefficient in inducing mesodermal markers in the animal region or a secondary axis when expressed in the ventral tissues. Taken together, our results reveal that rsf1 modulates similar developmental processes in early Xenopus embryos as components of PRC1 do, and that RSF1 acts at least partially through binding to the H2AK119ub mark via the UAB domain during development.

Dyrk1a is required for craniofacial development inXenopus laevis

“…This model has been established as an effective tool for studying how the face forms (Dickinson, 2016;Dickinson, 2023;Dubey and Saint-Jeannet, 2017;Dickinson, 2012, 2014;Sullivan and Levin, 2016;Vandenberg et al, 2012;Wyatt et al, 2020). Moreover, deficiency or mutations in the same genes that cause craniofacial abnormalities in humans also cause similar defects in Xenopus (Adams et al, 2016;Bajpai et al, 2010;Devotta et al, 2016;Dubey et al, 2018;Dubey and Saint-Jeannet, 2017;Greenberg et al, 2019;Hwang et al, 2019;Lasser et al, 2019;Mills et al, 2019;Mohammadparast and Chang, 2022;Parast et al, 2023;Tahir et al, 2014;Wahl et al, 2015;Wyatt et al, 2020).…”