2022
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221503.7062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of grape leaf diseases using MobileNetV3 and deep transfer learning

Abstract: Timely diagnosis and accurate identification of grape leaf diseases are decisive for controlling the spread of disease and ensuring the healthy development of the grape industry. The objective of this research was to propose a simple and efficient approach to improve grape leaf disease identification accuracy with limited computing resources and scale of training image dataset based on deep transfer learning and an improved MobileNetV3 model (GLD-DTL). A pre-training model was obtained by training MobileNetV3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model proposed in this paper performed cross-sectional performance comparison experiments with lightweight detection networks that were currently widely used in multiple fields. The selected comparison networks included the lightweight one-stage detection model YOLOX [ 91 ], the two-stage lightweight detection network ThunderNet [ 92 ], the ultra-lightweight Anchor Free detection network NanoDet [ 93 ], and detection networks using the lightweight backbone networks, such as ShuffleNetV2 [ 94 ] and MobileNetV3 [ 95 ], combined with the detectors proposed in this paper. The comparison experiments were subdivided into the detection of targets when shooting horizontally versus vertically, and the results of the comparison tests were shown in Figure 17 , Figure 18 , and Figure 19 , respectively.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model proposed in this paper performed cross-sectional performance comparison experiments with lightweight detection networks that were currently widely used in multiple fields. The selected comparison networks included the lightweight one-stage detection model YOLOX [ 91 ], the two-stage lightweight detection network ThunderNet [ 92 ], the ultra-lightweight Anchor Free detection network NanoDet [ 93 ], and detection networks using the lightweight backbone networks, such as ShuffleNetV2 [ 94 ] and MobileNetV3 [ 95 ], combined with the detectors proposed in this paper. The comparison experiments were subdivided into the detection of targets when shooting horizontally versus vertically, and the results of the comparison tests were shown in Figure 17 , Figure 18 , and Figure 19 , respectively.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sethy et al (2020) successfully identified four rice leaf diseases by combining deep convolutional neural networks and SVM, demonstrating that integrating deep features with SVM can achieve excellent classification, achieving an F1 score of 0.9838 [24]. Yin et al (2022) successfully developed a grape leaf disease identification method using an improved MobileNetV3 model and deep transfer learning. This method achieved recognition accuracy of up to 99.84% with limited computational resources and dataset size, and the model size was only 30 MB [25].…”
Section: Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study utilizes the enhanced YOLOv8 object detection network as the base model, incorporating an improved RFCBAM in place of commonly used lightweight feature extraction backbones like MobileNetV3 [37], MobileNetV2 [38], GhostNetV2 [39], and Shuf-fleNetV2 [40]. By maintaining consistent parameters except for the backbone network, the experimental results in Table 2 demonstrate the varying training effects of different backbone networks.…”
Section: Comparative Experiments 341 Backbone Network Comparison Expe...mentioning
confidence: 99%