2016
DOI: 10.1080/13682199.2016.1157944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of diffuse liver cirrhosis based on image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 shows that the use of weighting leads to a significant improvement in the recognition rate, where the recognition rate increases by 10%. From the obtained experimental results in [23], weighting is recommended. Considering a normal/steatosis classifier, the proposed algorithm in Section C achieves a recognition rate of 95% with GA and 66.7% without GA, as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 shows that the use of weighting leads to a significant improvement in the recognition rate, where the recognition rate increases by 10%. From the obtained experimental results in [23], weighting is recommended. Considering a normal/steatosis classifier, the proposed algorithm in Section C achieves a recognition rate of 95% with GA and 66.7% without GA, as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, perfect evaluation of the fibrosis stage or of the appearance of overt cirrhosis is essential not only to reach a right diagnosis but also to begin correct treatment to allow an initial diagnosis of the frequent and fatal complications of LC, such as HCC and esophageal varices [5]. There are many diagnosing imaging techniques, such as computerized tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, and ultrasound (US) scanning [6], which are used for liver disease detection. MRI and liver biopsies are both expensive and uncommon procedures [7] nevertheless, an image-acquisition US device is simple to operate, radiation-free, inexpensive, and obtainable in a wide range of radiology centers [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many diagnosing imaging techniques, such as computerized tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, and ultrasound (US) scanning [6], which are used for liver disease detection. MRI and liver biopsies are both expensive and uncommon procedures [7] nevertheless, an image-acquisition US device is simple to operate, radiation-free, inexpensive, and obtainable in a wide range of radiology centers [6]. One of the major drawbacks related to using the ultrasound is the low quality of the obtained images compared to those of CT and MRI [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%