2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of boards using wood fingerprints based on a fusion of feature detection methods

Abstract: This paper investigates the possibility to automatically match and recognize individual Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) boards using a fusion of two feature detection methods. The first method denoted Block matching method, detects corners and matches square regions around these corners using a normalized Sum of Squared Differences (SSD) measure. The second method denoted the SURF (Speeded-Up Robust Features) matching method, matches SURF features between images (Bay et al., 2008). The fusion of the two featu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where A l (L i ) stands for the conductivity matrix of the L i , A Hessian matrix is then used to detect the interest points. The image of different sizes needs to be normalized with respect to scale [38] with formula (15). After finding the Hessian matrix, the points with higher gray values than neighbors are picked up as the key-points.…”
Section: ) Key Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where A l (L i ) stands for the conductivity matrix of the L i , A Hessian matrix is then used to detect the interest points. The image of different sizes needs to be normalized with respect to scale [38] with formula (15). After finding the Hessian matrix, the points with higher gray values than neighbors are picked up as the key-points.…”
Section: ) Key Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the wood image using a microscope or magnifying glass, and classifying the wood species with computing models such as neural networks or deep learning models are the two most discussed topics in this field. In recent years, the methods based on the image have succeeded in wood species recognition [11]- [15]. R.Schraml and H.Hofbauer attempted to use the fingerprint and iris recognition methods to distinguish the individual wood entities [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the solutions focus either on the re-identification of logs before sawing (log-tolog matching) or on matching boards before and after drying (board-to-board matching). The methods include cross-section images of the log ends [11], laser scans and RFID-tags for logs [2], and image-based matching for boards [8,9]. While the existing solutions provide a high tracing accuracy for the beginning and the end of the sawmill process, extending the tracing to cover the actual sawing (board-to-log matching) remains a challenge due to the following obvious reasons: 1) the material goes through a remarkable transformation and 2) the imaging modalities are different.…”
Section: Timber Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system trains some defect classifiers, such as a matching algorithm, support vector machine (SVM), neural network and deep learning, to determine the defect region [15,16]. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, T. Pahlberg [17] fused a Block Match algorithm and Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) algorithm to achieve the detection of the defect features of Scottish pine, obtaining good matching accuracy and improving the recognition rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%