1985
DOI: 10.1070/im1985v024n03abeh001245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of an Approximate Occurrence of Words on a Turing Machine in Real Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ivanov (1985) constructed a multi-head Turing machine which in real time solved the string matching problem with k mismatches The automaton strategy (i.e., construct an automaton in step 1 to scan text in step 2) has been used in algorithms for approximate string matching problems.…”
Section: Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ivanov (1985) constructed a multi-head Turing machine which in real time solved the string matching problem with k mismatches The automaton strategy (i.e., construct an automaton in step 1 to scan text in step 2) has been used in algorithms for approximate string matching problems.…”
Section: Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masek and Paterson [38] have designed an algorithm that can be thought of as a finite automaton of O(n) states, which finds the edit distance between the pattern and the strings in the database in O(mn/ log n) time. Further speed-ups can be obtained using this automata-theoretic approach [32,55]; however such improvements seem to require automata with exponentially many states, and an exponentially large preprocessing time to construct the automata; therefore they are only of theoretical interest, and are only applicable when m is much smaller than n.…”
Section: Longest Common Subsequences and Edit Distance Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%