Recognition Memory for Movement in Photographs: A Developmental Study

Futterweit, Lorelle R.; Beilin, Harry

doi:10.1006/jecp.1994.1008

Cited by 46 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kerzel's (2006) speculations regarding links between representational momentum and apparent motion are intriguing but contain weaknesses. First, representational momentum occurs with stimuli that do not produce apparent motion (e.g., frozen-action photographs; Futterweit & Beilin, 1994). Second, apparent motion cannot account for displacement in directions other than the direction of target motion (e.g., O displacement; Hubbard & Bharucha, 1988).…”

Section: Flashed Objects and Moving Objectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computational Theory and Cognition in Representational Momentum and Related Types of Displacement: A reply to Kerzel

Hubbard

2006

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kerzel's (2006) commentary on Hubbard's (2005) Freyd and Finke (1984) and Hubbard and Bharucha (1988) converged on the idea that memory was displaced, but this challenge overlooks salient aspects of my view (e.g., differences between computational theory level and implementation level; displacement resulting from either lowlevel perception or high-level cognition is reflected in subsequent memory). More generally, Kerzel's commentary highlights differences of interpretation on several issues regarding data and theory between Kerzel and myself but, unfortunately, also contains mischaracterizations of my position that exaggerate the apparent differences between our views. These differences of interpretation and mischaracterizations will be briefly addressed.

show abstract

Section: Flashed Objects and Moving Objectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computational Theory and Cognition in Representational Momentum and Related Types of Displacement: A reply to Kerzel

Hubbard

2006

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, disrupting the order of the inducing stimuli, such that the coherence of an implied motion is damaged will not yield representational momentum effect (e.g., Freyd & Finke, 1984). Similarly, in frozen motion studies, the same two pictures presented in reverse do not yield an RMlike effect (e.g., Freyd, 1983;Futterweit & Beilin, 1994).…”

Section: Representational Momentummentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Freyd (1993) has argued convincingly that the impact of frozen action photographs and actual motion on mental representation is derived from the same principles. Example of a "frozen motion" photograph , similar in kind to those used in Freyd (1983) and Futterweit and Beilin (1994).…”

Section: Dynamic Representation Of Scenesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, although there was a similar asymmetrical trend in response accuracy, unlike typical RM results, correct rejection of the distractors did not differ between conditions. Futterweit and Beilin (1994) attempted to address the accuracy issue by replicating Freyd's (1983) study using a more sensitive test. They also tested the effect both in children (8-10 years of age) and adults to determine if the phenomenon was age related.…”

Section: Implied Motion In Static Scenes (Frozen Action)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Disequilibria of forces in the world convey a mental representation that reflects implied dynamics. This is why, not only moving displays, but also static pictures (Freyd, 1983;Freyd et al, 1988;Futterweit & Beilin, 1994) and works of art (e.g., paintings and sculptures; Freyd, 1993) can convey motion and a sense of dynamic tension. Representations are not snapshots.…”

Section: Representational Momentummentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement?

Intraub¹

2002

Visual Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Displacement in depth: Representational momentum and boundary extension

Hubbard

1996

Psychol. Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Memory for targets moving in depth and for stationary targets was examined in five experiments. Memory for targets moving in depth was displaced behind the target with slower target velocities (longer ISIs and retention intervals) and beyond the target with faster target velocities (shorter ISIs and retention intervals), and the overall magnitude of forward displacement for motion in depth was less than the overall magnitude of forward displacement for motion in the picture plane. Memory for stationary targets was initially displaced away from the observer, but memory for smaller stationary targets was subsequently displaced toward the observer and memory for larger stationary targets was subsequently displaced away from the observer; memory for the top or bottom edge of a stationary target was displaced inside the target perimeter. The data are consistent with Freyd and Johnson's (1987) two-component model of the time course of representational momentum and with Intraub et al.'s (1992) two-component model of boundary extension.

show abstract

Recognition Memory for Movement in Photographs: A Developmental Study

Cited by 46 publications

References 0 publications

Computational Theory and Cognition in Representational Momentum and Related Types of Displacement: A reply to Kerzel

Computational Theory and Cognition in Representational Momentum and Related Types of Displacement: A reply to Kerzel

Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement?

Displacement in depth: Representational momentum and boundary extension

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About