2013
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2012.710275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition Memory for Faces and Scenes

Abstract: Previous studies have suggested that face memory is unique; however, evidence is inconclusive. To further explore this issue, we investigated recognition memory for unfamiliar faces and scenes. Participants (n = 123) intentionally memorized the stimuli and then engaged in recognition tests. Recognition was measured following short (20 minutes) and long (3 weeks) retention intervals. Encoding strategies and intelligence were also measured. Recognition memory performance for faces was higher than that for scenes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is noteworthy as the set size of faces was substantially larger than for odors and that odors were perceived as more familiar than the faces. This outcome concurs with the notion of an exceptional human ability to recognize faces ( Yin 1969 ; Sato and Yoshikawa 2013 ). In congruence with a large body of evidence, recognition memory ( d ′) was better for high familiar than low familiar stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is noteworthy as the set size of faces was substantially larger than for odors and that odors were perceived as more familiar than the faces. This outcome concurs with the notion of an exceptional human ability to recognize faces ( Yin 1969 ; Sato and Yoshikawa 2013 ). In congruence with a large body of evidence, recognition memory ( d ′) was better for high familiar than low familiar stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Faces have been described as a unique class of stimuli ( Ellis 1975 ) and research has indicated that face memory is superior to many other visual stimulus materials ( Sato and Yoshikawa 2013 ). Although odors and faces evidently are 2 fundamentally different stimulus types, they share some common features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral researchers have pointed out that faces are unique among visual objects because they are socially relevant and contain multifaceted information, including cues pertaining to emotional content or one's identity [Bruce and Young, 1986;Ekman and Friesen, 1975]. Behavioral studies empirically confirmed that faces are perceived more rapidly [Hershler and Hochstein, 2005;Landau and Bentin, 2008;Purcell and Stewart, 1986;Ro et al, 2001;Tottenham et al, 2006] and memorized more accurately [Sato and Yoshikawa, 2013;Yin, 1969Yin, , 1970] than other objects. The studies also showed that multifaceted information in faces is processed in an integrative manner that supports such efficient/ robust face processing [Calder et al, 2000;McKelvie, 1995;Milders et al, 2006;€ Ohman et al, 2001;Sato and Yoshikawa, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minutes after birth human neonates preferentially orient toward schematic faces (Morton & Johnson, 1991;Pascalis & Kelly, 2009) and by adulthood humans show a remarkable aptitude for memorizing, attending to, and recognizing faces (Bruce & Young, 1986;Coin & Tiberghien, 1997;Sato & Yoshikawa, 2013;Theeuwes & Van der Stigchel, 2006). Adults also spontaneously ascribe traits to faces within a matter of milliseconds (Willis & Todorov, 2006) and research suggests that these rapid judgments correlate with actual personality (e.g., Penton-Voak, Pound, Little, & Perrett, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%