Recognition and Redistribution

Abstract

Nancy Fraser has elaborated a framework for analyzing different forms of oppression using the categories of redistribution and recognition. This framework has come under criticism from Iris Marion Young and Judith Butler, despite the fact that all three theorists similarly insist that justice is not reducible solely to economic justice and that struggles against ‘cultural’ forms of oppression are equally important. Drawing on the debate between these theorists, in this article I examine the ways in which their respective theoretical frameworks are potentially problematic or do not go far enough in theorizing the complex interconnections among economics, politics and culture. For example, Fraser’s binary economy/culture and Young’s distinction between culture and structure are overly broad and potentially misleading. Butler and Fraser also appear to adopt undertheorized and economistic conceptualizations of ‘the economy’ and capitalism. In the course of my critique, I propose a somewhat different approach to analyzing the causes of various forms of oppression and the relation between different emancipatory struggles. Among other things, I argue that social relationships need to be disaggregated further, into more than just two categories, and that the economic and the cultural (as well as the political) should be analyzed as always complexly overdetermining each other.

Ukraine's poor majority: Exploring the driving factors of subjective poverty

“…These scholars argue that no social practice is ever purely economic, cultural, or political. Ending an 'economic' injustice always entails changing the discourse that justifies the unjust distribution (Swanson, 2005).…”

The Janus face of precarity – Securitisation of Roma mobility in the UK

“…In short, there is a contextualised intersection between immigration concerns, labour market demands, cultural fears and citizenship that defines inclusion ( Orgad, 2010 ). Accordingly, social inclusion of migrants in a neoliberal market economy has communitarian preconditions in a nation state that are defined by cultural recognition of financial strategies by the national majority ( Swanson, 2005 ). As it will be elaborated, employment of many Roma migrants in the grey economy is considered by the majority population as suspicious, or illegal, culturally ‘unfitting’, or even dangerous, and thus there is a denial of Roma self-sustaining behaviours, innovative and social economic value.…”

Scaling Up Social Problems

“…These dual processes of individualizing and convening larger swaths of the public converge to make it an ideal time for social work to become one of the leading voices of social change on social media. Promoting group dedifferentiation, rather than exacerbating differences, provides a strategic opportunity for common struggles that promote compatible policy solutions (Swanson, 2005); social work has a longstanding expertise in identifying and sustaining dialogue across difference. This expertise can be paired with social media technology to raise awareness of key social issues (i.e., the grand challenges), build dialogue, shape public opinion through that dialogue, and build support for proposed solutions.…”