2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0607-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease in an Elderly Ambulatory Population

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing problem among the elderly. Early detection is considered essential to ensure proper treatment and to avoid drug toxicity, but detection is challenging because elderly patients with CKD often have normal serum creatinine levels. We hypothesized that most cases of CKD in the elderly would go undetected, resulting in inappropriate prescribing. OBJECTIVE:To determine whether recognition of CKD is associated with more appropriate treatment DESIGN: Retrospective … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of Italian general practitioners, only 15.2% of patients with eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 had an ICD-9 diagnosis of CKD [15]. Another study at an academic heath-care center found recognition rates of 38 and 87% for stage 3 and 4, respectively [16]. The consistent finding in all these data is that physician recognition of mild to moderate kidney disease is suboptimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a study of Italian general practitioners, only 15.2% of patients with eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 had an ICD-9 diagnosis of CKD [15]. Another study at an academic heath-care center found recognition rates of 38 and 87% for stage 3 and 4, respectively [16]. The consistent finding in all these data is that physician recognition of mild to moderate kidney disease is suboptimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As these studies illustrate, eGFR reporting alone without educational interventions appears to be insufficient in changing provider practice behavior [55,56]. Furthermore, rates of predialysis nephrology care in recent US studies do not appear to have changed, as up to one-third of patients with severe CKD (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) still do not receive a nephrology referral and a similar proportion of incident ESKD patients never received pre-ESKD nephrology care [16,57]. …”
Section: Dearth Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple lines of evidence indicate that clinicians infer GFR from serum creatinine rather poorly (13,14). This is not surprising because the relation is not linear and the rates of creatinine production vary widely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%