2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13394-014-0120-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognising ‘good at mathematics’: using a performative lens for identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main limitation of this overemphasis is the tendency to neglect the study of the mechanisms of production and reproduction of identities with others in real contextual practices. It is interesting to note here that some researchers have conceptually, and operationally, addressed this limitation by defining narratives as identity performances or enactments (e.g., see Braathe & Solomon, 2015;Darragh, 2015). Studies using this conceptualization have paid close attention to how different languages and discourses are used when interacting with the interviewer (e.g., Braathe & Solomon, 2015) or how they are employed to position the self in relation to multiple others/voices (e.g., Lim, 2008;Solomon, 2012), thus allowing some insight into underlying mechanisms of production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of this overemphasis is the tendency to neglect the study of the mechanisms of production and reproduction of identities with others in real contextual practices. It is interesting to note here that some researchers have conceptually, and operationally, addressed this limitation by defining narratives as identity performances or enactments (e.g., see Braathe & Solomon, 2015;Darragh, 2015). Studies using this conceptualization have paid close attention to how different languages and discourses are used when interacting with the interviewer (e.g., Braathe & Solomon, 2015) or how they are employed to position the self in relation to multiple others/voices (e.g., Lim, 2008;Solomon, 2012), thus allowing some insight into underlying mechanisms of production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences and tensions in the ways these themes were valued by the students and teachers, promoted by classroom experiences, and performed by the students were explored. Darragh (2015) also found there were a number of different "scripts" students can call upon in their recognition of a performance of "good at mathematics". Differences were highlighted between the teachers' view of what were important performances for students' successful learning and what the students thought they should be doing in order to be successful in mathematics.…”
Section: Operationalising Identitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The students produced their identity narratives through negotiating meaning between their relationship with mathematics and their interaction with classmates, families, by the class they were placed in, where they were positioned in the class, assessment results, performances, prizes, and through their doing of mathematics. Darragh (2013Darragh ( , 2015 used the metaphor of performance to portray identity. Through investigating the mathematics identities of 22 students and their 16 teachers in the students' transition from primary school to secondary school, three themes of what is valued emerged: asking questions, perseverance (persistence), and confidence.…”
Section: Operationalising Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, researchers have continually demonstrated how sociocultural and historical scripted roles dictate and reproduce what one can be, do, or say mathematically (see Betz and Sekaquaptewa 2012). Consider the work of Darragh (2015) who interviewed students as they were transitioning from elementary school to high school and who showed how institutional practices of streaming and privileged ways of doing mathematics "provide a script for performing 'good at mathematics' that works to assist other students in excluding themselves from further mathematics" (p. 100).…”
Section: Socioculturally Available Selfhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%