Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research

Abstract

States that there are two general approaches to reasoning which may result in the acquisition of new knowledge: inductive reasoning commences with observation of specific instances, and seeks to establish generalisations; deductive reasoning commences with generalisations, and seeks to see if these generalisations apply to specific instances. Most often, qualitative research follows an inductive process. In most instances, however, theory developed from qualitative investigation is untested theory. Both quantitative and qualitative researchers demonstrate deductive and inductive processes in their research, but fail to recognise these processes. The research paradigm followed in this article is a postpositivist (``realist'') one. This is not incompatible with the use of qualitative research methods. Argues that the adoption of formal deductive procedures can represent an important step for assuring conviction in qualitative research findings. Discusses how, and under what circumstances, qualitative researchers might adopt formal deductive procedures in their research. One approach, theory testing by``pattern matching'', is illustrated with a sample application.

Role of Faculty Development Forums in Virtual Teaching Environment: A Case Study of Marketing Research & Case Group

“…In a case study the researcher has less control over occurrence, and the focus remains on contemporary phenomenon in line with real-life context. Hyde (2000) explained that qualitative methods seek to recognize the core notions and effort to find the associations between variables. The qualitative data method comprehends the transcripts of interviews or observation.…”

Ethical Reflections of Interviewing Young Children:Opportunities and Challenges for PromotingChildren’s Inclusion and Participation

“…An abductive approach is described as an attempt "to compare alongside…to show side by side" (Kovách & Spens, 2005) and can be viewed through intuition or as a kind of a systematized creativity to create "new" knowledge in research process (Andreewsky & Bourcier, 2000) through several cycles of interaction between researchers, theory and data using the benefits from both inductive and deductive approach (Kovách & Spens, 2005). In an inductive approach, data about the researched phenomenon guide the analysis process, while in a deductive approach, the analysis is theoretically derived (Hyde, 2000), whereas in abductive analysis, the key element is the interaction between the theory and the data to acquire new knowledge about the phenomenon. The researcher creates a framework of different theories together with the data in a creative process of "theory matching".…”

Line Managers’ Devolution in Achieving Employee Engagement: Cracking the Code for Organizational Performance

“…As (Hyde, 2000) suggested that many social scientists and researchers are now agreed to the view that both the qualitative and quantitative methods can be used for a valid research. Similarly, (EasterbySmith et al, 1991) proposed that many researchers who took up a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches are a balanced proposition of any type of research.…”

“…Similarly, (EasterbySmith et al, 1991) proposed that many researchers who took up a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches are a balanced proposition of any type of research. Hence, it is not a question of which method should be used for reasoning either induction or deduction sometimes both are required for research attempts and using any one of those could be objectionable (Hyde, 2000).…”

“…In fact, the most famous version of this view is postulated by (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) that in contrast to deductive approach, the theory which is developed inductively is much more likely in terms of data validation and is more useful, credible and reasonable for practicing managers. Moreover, (Hyde, 2000) proposed that qualitative research actually follows inductive approach where as, quantitative research falls on deductive one. In addition, inductive method was build up in the social sciences context in order to encourage researchers to examine social and cultural study and it could be conducted in the form of surveys, questionnaires, interviews and observation (Gill & Johnson, 2002).…”