2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1705528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclassification of Genetic Variants in Children with Long QT Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were 18 years or younger at the time of diagnosis. Those who were lost to follow-up were censored at the time of their last contact; part of this patient cohort was included in a recent publication [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were 18 years or younger at the time of diagnosis. Those who were lost to follow-up were censored at the time of their last contact; part of this patient cohort was included in a recent publication [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intragenic risk evaluation has been realized for LQTS patients based on mutation type, location, and cellular function [29] . LQT1 patients with transmembrane-spanning are at greater risk of an LQT1-triggered cardiac event than patients with C-terminal region mutations [30] .…”
Section: Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the utility of our approach, the functional evidence level determined from this assay was applied to enhance the classification of 18 KCNH2 missense variants detected by Westphal et al in children with suspected LQTS. 10 Evidence of abnormal LoF was found for 14 missense variants (Figure 2A, yellow and brown circles and Table S3). Four variants were in the range of normal function (Table S3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Overall, the variants that were determined by our assay to have severe LoF were detected in individuals with a more severe clinical phenotype (measured by Schwartz score) and a more prolonged QTc, this is consistent with previous observations. 13,14 The variant classifications in Westphal et al 10 were revised by applying the level of functional evidence at the strength determined by the Z-scores (Table S3). Considering this additional evidence, the classification of one variant (p.Leu697His) was upgraded from VUS to likely pathogenic after PS3 was applied at strong level (Table S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%