2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclassification of atypical immature metaplasia of the uterine cervix by combination of nuclear features on hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections without auxiliary immunohistochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, cellular atypia in Pap smears could only be evaluated by approaches supported by pathological diagnostic results or those of dual IHC for p16 and Ki67. 8,9 However, these approaches only indirectly evaluate cellular findings. As we cannot confirm that the cell cluster being evaluated is identical to that in the lesion, and even if IHC is positive for both p16 and Ki-67, we still cannot confirm if the cell cluster is derived from the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, cellular atypia in Pap smears could only be evaluated by approaches supported by pathological diagnostic results or those of dual IHC for p16 and Ki67. 8,9 However, these approaches only indirectly evaluate cellular findings. As we cannot confirm that the cell cluster being evaluated is identical to that in the lesion, and even if IHC is positive for both p16 and Ki-67, we still cannot confirm if the cell cluster is derived from the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study provides new evidence that IM with nucleoli and varied nuclear sizes may be caused by CIN2‐derived HPV and are more likely to be CIN2‐derived cell clusters, which require additional management. Previously, cellular atypia in Pap smears could only be evaluated by approaches supported by pathological diagnostic results or those of dual IHC for p16 and Ki67 8,9 . However, these approaches only indirectly evaluate cellular findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations