Reclamation of Cultivated Land Reserves in Northeast China: Indigenous Ecological Insecurity Underlying National Food Security

Abstract

The competition for land resources created by the need for food security and ecological security is intensifying globally. To resolve the issue of land scarcity in agriculture following rapid urbanization, China implemented its requisition–compensation balance policy of cultivated lands in 1997, the introduction of which consumed numerous areas of land, such as river shoal and bare land, through reclamation. Moreover, these reclaimed and newly cultivated lands were mainly distributed in the northern part of China. Most previous studies of this subject have only examined the overall balance of cultivated lands in well-developed regions, and there is a lack of knowledge about the indigenous gains and losses before and after reclamation in important areas such as northeast China. Therefore, this study selected two representative county-level units in northeast China as the study area to analyze the conversion of cultivated land reserves during 1996–2015, evaluate the performance of reclaimed cultivated lands in terms of quality and productivity and calculate reclamation-induced changes in ecosystem service value. The results indicated that by 2015 only 16.02% of the original cultivated land reserves remained unconverted; nearly 60% were reclaimed as cultivated lands and over 20% were converted to other land resources. River shoal and ruderal land were the primary resources for cultivated lands compensation, and marsh, bare land and saline-alkaline land were found to be converted the most thoroughly. The gain of 23018.55 ha reclaimed cultivated lands were of relatively inferior quality and lower productivity, contributing approximately 4.32% of total grain output. However, this modest gain was at the expense of a 768.03 million yuan ecosystem services loss, with regulating services and supporting services being undermined the most. We argue that even if northeast China continues to shoulder the responsibility of compensating for a majority of cultivated land losses, it still needs to carefully process reclamation and introduce practical measures to protect indigenous ecosystems, in order to better serve the local residents and ensure prolonged food security with sustainability.

Land-Use Change Impacts from Sustainable Hydropower Production in EU28 Region: An Empirical Analysis

“…This is aligned with the prior research of ref. [54,55], which refers that institutional quality contributes to a reduction in land-use change. This suggests that the improvement of the institutional efficiency and compliance with outstanding criterion achievements ought to help to mitigate the land-use change in the EU28 region.…”

Effects of Urbanization on Ecosystem Services in the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration, in China: The Case of Weifang City

“…It was the second wave to sweep the world after industrialization and has become the direct driving force of global economic transformation and environmental change since the 18th century [2]. A higher degree of urbanization has a significant effect on promoting socioeconomic development [3]. Urbanization is closely related to ecosystem services [4].…”

“…Urbanization has a significant impact on the structure, function and spatial evolution of regional ecosystems, and seriously affects the ecosystem services [1]. The major problems associated with urbanization include the unregulated growth of cities [4], the occupation of a large amount of cultivated lands [3], and the triggering of issues such as urban greenhouse gas emission, energy shortages, and heat island effects [9]. Bai et al (2018) used the principal component analysis method to estimate the comprehensive urbanization level of 281 prefecture-level cities [14].…”

Quantitatively Determining the Priorities of Regional Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Different Main Functional Areas: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China

“…Regarding the division of compensation areas, currently, the most widely used method is the division of cultivated land surplus/deficit areas based on the food security method [44]. However, economic value is often obtained through food security [45,46], and little attention is paid to the nonmarket value of cultivated land. In addition, some researchers calculate the ecological footprint of cultivated land and study the economic compensation zoning of cultivated land protection based on the supply-demand relationship of the cultivated land's ecological carrying capacity [39].…”