2015
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclamation of boreal forest after oil sands mining: anticipating novel challenges in novel environments

Abstract: Boreal forests in northern Alberta have a growing anthropogenic footprint due to a rapidly growing oil sands mining industry. Although land reclamation is a necessary aspect of responsible industrial development, these activities nearly always affect higher order landscape components such as the broader landform, and its hydrology and biogeochemistry. Recent anthropogenic impacts are then believed to result in new environmental conditions and obstacles under which the boreal forest is developing, potentially l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oil sands mining results in the complete removal of forest ecosystems to access the oil sands ore followed by ecosystem reconstruction during land reclamation [12]. This reclamation process involves landform construction of overburden or tailings dumps, which are subsequently capped with cover soils rich in organic matter of either upland or the wetland origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oil sands mining results in the complete removal of forest ecosystems to access the oil sands ore followed by ecosystem reconstruction during land reclamation [12]. This reclamation process involves landform construction of overburden or tailings dumps, which are subsequently capped with cover soils rich in organic matter of either upland or the wetland origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of reliable, and ecologically relevant means of determining recovery rates and trajectories is a significant challenge in restoration ecology and ecosystem management (Ruiz-Jaen & Aide, 2005). Defining, setting and measuring benchmarks will require different indicators of ecosystem state and function (Audet, Pinno & Thiffault, 2015), and microbial communities in streams may be useful as one of these indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Pinno and Hawkes (). This probably resulted from reduced resource availability in the understorey with increasing overstorey canopy closure and standing biomass as stands age from stand initiation stage to stem exclusion stage (Audet et al., ; Bartels & Chen, ; Chen & Popadiouk, ; Halpern & Lutz, ; Pinno & Hawkes, ; Zhang et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time since restoration or reclamation also affects understorey vegetation (Audet, Pinno, & Thiffault, 2015;Pinno & Hawkes, 2015;Rowland, Prescott, Grayston, Quideau, & Bradfield, 2009). Typically, canopy closure increases over time from stand establishment to maturity (Chen & Popadiouk, 2002;Oliver & Larson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%