2007
DOI: 10.1177/0022487107307949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclaiming the Moral in the Dispositions Debate

Abstract: This article addresses the current debates about the definition and assessment of dispositions in teacher education. Competing perspectives on the definitions and assessment of dispositions in teacher education are examined and critiqued, and a renewed commitment to foregrounding the moral nature of teaching is suggested. Recommendations for understanding and assessing the moral in teacher education, including the development of a code of ethics for the profession, are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The historical development and current applications of ethical philosophy need to be explored in depth and in context in pre-service teacher education programs (Mergler, 2008). Burant, Chubbuck and Whipp, (2007) argued for an urgent re-focusing on morals through teacher training programs: …we are convinced that our attention in teacher education must shift considerably to the formation not only of knowledge and skills but also of the moral sensibility that underlies them. The moral nature of teaching cannot be conflated with the knowledge and skills important for teaching; neither can it be neatly separated from them.…”
Section: Teacher Values and Beliefs Ethics Education And Values Educmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical development and current applications of ethical philosophy need to be explored in depth and in context in pre-service teacher education programs (Mergler, 2008). Burant, Chubbuck and Whipp, (2007) argued for an urgent re-focusing on morals through teacher training programs: …we are convinced that our attention in teacher education must shift considerably to the formation not only of knowledge and skills but also of the moral sensibility that underlies them. The moral nature of teaching cannot be conflated with the knowledge and skills important for teaching; neither can it be neatly separated from them.…”
Section: Teacher Values and Beliefs Ethics Education And Values Educmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of related literature pointed to an extended historical debate (Borko, Liston, & Whitcomb, 2007;Burant, Chubbuck, & Whipp, 2007;Damon, 2007;Diez, 2007;Sockett, 2006;Socket, 2009;Villegas, 2007) in pursuit of an operational definition of dispositions. This debate hinged on a wide variation in theoretic frameworks including psychology, sociology, ethics, and finally philosophy.…”
Section: Dispositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noddings (1991) has also believed that teachers must focus on the development of the student's sense of ethics, that nurturing the child's moral fiber is the primary responsibility of teachers. Burant, Chubbuck and Whipp (2007) discussed the teacher's practice in terms of ideas and feelings that reflect a "moral sensibility," which connects the selfhood of the teacher with his or her behaviors in the classroom. Citing Hansen's work of 2001, these authors further explicated that '"a teacher's moral sensibility should be understood as an achievement in its own right…it is not like a tool [emphasis added] that a teacher pulls out of a box and then replaces once he or she has done the sensible thing"' (p. 405).…”
Section: Chapter Two: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%