2013
DOI: 10.3390/su5041598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclaim “Education” in Environmental and Sustainability Education Research

Abstract: Abstract:The nascent research area of Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE) needs a firm grounding in educational philosophy in order to focus more on education. This conclusion is based on experiences at two recent conferences focusing on research in this field. Issues related to content, attitudes and long-term aims dominated at these conferences, while learning processes were often taken for granted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct experience is irreplaceable and makes a clear impact, and this is reflected by the respondents themselves retrospectively. Such an experience has a distinct educational effect that supports the educational potential of environmental and sustainability education (Sund and Lysgaard 2013), and it is, in fact, also a possible way of introducing the theme of environmental sustainability as an educational issue in early childhood education, without the need to use discursive constructs (Duhn 2012). Our investigation also confirms the assumption that non-formal and informal education projects (which are thoroughly reflective, engaging in dialogue, mentoring, and self-directed learning) using the natural environment and outdoor stayswhich offer an immediate experience through our senses instead of screens and technological devices -stimulate spiritual well-being (English 2000;Nash 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct experience is irreplaceable and makes a clear impact, and this is reflected by the respondents themselves retrospectively. Such an experience has a distinct educational effect that supports the educational potential of environmental and sustainability education (Sund and Lysgaard 2013), and it is, in fact, also a possible way of introducing the theme of environmental sustainability as an educational issue in early childhood education, without the need to use discursive constructs (Duhn 2012). Our investigation also confirms the assumption that non-formal and informal education projects (which are thoroughly reflective, engaging in dialogue, mentoring, and self-directed learning) using the natural environment and outdoor stayswhich offer an immediate experience through our senses instead of screens and technological devices -stimulate spiritual well-being (English 2000;Nash 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sund and Lysgaard (2013) express caution about the risk of focusing on societal outcomes and changing public behaviour rather than on educational processes. One should ask if ESD really promotes the acquisition of knowledge and understanding, and supports the development of independent thought or mainly stresses the aim of behaviour modification through education.…”
Section: Research In Esd/sustainability Educationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The student also has an active role as a learner who constructs new relevant knowledge. (Tani, 2008;Robottom & Hart, 1993;Sund & Lysgaard, 2013) ESD teaching should avoid restricted and normative approaches, which are simply intended to change the students' attitudes or to coach them to cope in an already defined future. Instead, ESD in chemistry should find ways to invite students to democratically participate in individual and global change according to their own ideas and experiences to create a future.…”
Section: Practical Pedagogical Models Of Esd In Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A challenge for ESD in chemistry is to come to the learners' level and ask what their demands or relevancies are in making the change. (Sund & Lysgaard, 2013) Zsóka et al (2013) divided students into five categories (hedonist, techno-optimist, active environmentalist, familiar and careless) according to their environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behaviour and everyday environmental awareness. They point out that there is high variety in the level of commitment and interest among students towards sustainability issues, which should be taken into account when designing courses and curricula for them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%