“…9,10 Imaging systems play a highly important role in this assessment, since in the works by Barrington, Meignan and Kulkarni, the comparison of imaging studies before and after treatment was shown to be vital in order to not have false positive or false negative results. 16,17,20 Now, for the assessment of response, the imaging specialist of the CT department used a qualitative method in 39 (90.7 %) and a systematized quantitative method (RECIST 1.1) only in four (9.3 %) subjects, which is not in agreement with international guidelines recommendations, which suggest a systematization of tumor assessment supported by a digital imaging system, 11,12,13 in contrast to that which was observed in the doctors of the PET/CT department, who reported their results based on PERCIST or Deauville criteria, which are indicated in Lugano's criteria to assess treatment response. 17 PERCIST criteria were used in 13 cases (30.2 %) and Deauville criteria in 30 (69.8 %), taking into account that the five-point classification is the most commonly used in this department and that it correlates with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommendation.…”