1988
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7142(88)90014-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocity theorems in geoelectric and geoelectromagnetic work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Syscal Pro electrical resistivity meter (Iris Instruments, Orleans, France) was used to measure apparent electrical resistivity, Ra over a dipole-dipole electrode configuration (see, for example, Binley 2015). These data were checked for reciprocity of measurements (Parasnis 1988) and then inverted to give a 2-D distribution of soil resistivity using the Occam's based R2 (version 2.7a) ERT inverse code (Binley 2013). The resistivity was converted to conductivity data (σ ERT ) and on each plot means were taken in the horizontal direction to give a 1-dimensional (1-D) electrical conductivity profile, which could be used to calibrate EMI data (Shanahan et al 2015) to make it consistent with resistivity profiles determined from ERT.…”
Section: Electrical Resistance Tomography (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Syscal Pro electrical resistivity meter (Iris Instruments, Orleans, France) was used to measure apparent electrical resistivity, Ra over a dipole-dipole electrode configuration (see, for example, Binley 2015). These data were checked for reciprocity of measurements (Parasnis 1988) and then inverted to give a 2-D distribution of soil resistivity using the Occam's based R2 (version 2.7a) ERT inverse code (Binley 2013). The resistivity was converted to conductivity data (σ ERT ) and on each plot means were taken in the horizontal direction to give a 1-dimensional (1-D) electrical conductivity profile, which could be used to calibrate EMI data (Shanahan et al 2015) to make it consistent with resistivity profiles determined from ERT.…”
Section: Electrical Resistance Tomography (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DD type surveys use dipole lengths (a-factor) of 1 to 3m and dipole separation (n-factor) of 1a to 10a, and involve reciprocal measurements. Exchanging current and potential electrodes should ideally deliver the 355 same results, as stated by the reciprocity theorem (Parasnis, 1988). Comparing forward and reciprocal measurements provides a robust method for estimating the data error and quality (LaBrecque et al, 1996b;Wilkinson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ert Monitoring Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this, equivalent reciprocal measurements were made with the current and potential bipoles interchanged (so that the potential differences are now measured beneath the current electrodes). The purpose of making reciprocal measurements is that, in the absence of systematic and random error, equivalent forward and reciprocal electrode configurations should yield the same resistivity value (Parasnis, 1988;Zhou and Dahlin, 2003). Any difference between the two gives a reliable indicator of the error in the measurement.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%