2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.09624
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocity, community detection, and link prediction in dynamic networks

Abstract: Many complex systems change their structure over time, in these cases dynamic networks can provide a richer representation of such phenomena. As a consequence, many inference methods have been generalized to the dynamic case with the aim to model dynamic interactions. Particular interest has been devoted to extend the stochastic block model and its variant, to capture community structure as the network changes in time. While these models assume that edge formation depends only on the community memberships, rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This choice may be more natural in scenarios where individuals form ties on a case-by-case basis rather than predominantly via one of the two mechanisms explored here. This could potentially account for a further mechanism for edge formation, as reciprocity [29][30][31]. Similarly, when node attributes are available along with the network dataset, it would be compelling to adapt the model to suitably incorporate this extra information using insights from previous works [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice may be more natural in scenarios where individuals form ties on a case-by-case basis rather than predominantly via one of the two mechanisms explored here. This could potentially account for a further mechanism for edge formation, as reciprocity [29][30][31]. Similarly, when node attributes are available along with the network dataset, it would be compelling to adapt the model to suitably incorporate this extra information using insights from previous works [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%