IntroductionThe pool of circulating CD8 ϩ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) is remarkably heterogeneous, consisting of antigen inexperienced naive cells as well as multiple populations of effector and memory subsets. 1 Various models have been proposed to explain the genesis of memory subsets, and a significant body of evidence suggests that long-lived memory cells are derived from early effector cells that survive contraction as antigen loads wane. 2 If so, then the diverse spectrum of memory cells that fall into either effector memory (T EM ) or central memory (T CM ) categories would also be predicted to be derived from a common pool of primary effectors. 3 Regardless of their origins, T EM and T CM differ substantially in their functional capabilities, and the extrinsic signals that regulate their development are complex and multifactorial. Among these factors, innate cytokines are key signals that regulate effector cell differentiation, 4 with IL-12 and type I interferon (IFN-␣/) playing important roles in both effector and memory cell development. 5 In humans, CD8 ϩ subsets have been distinguished based on their differential expression of various markers, including CD45RA, CD27, CD28, CCR7, CD62L, CD127, and CXCR3. [6][7][8][9] Based solely on the expression of CCR7 and CD45RA, early studies defined 4 main subsets: naive (CD45RA ϩ /CCR7 ϩ ), T CM (CD45RA Ϫ / CCR7 ϩ ), T EM (CD45RA Ϫ /CCR7 Ϫ ), and effector memory-RA (T EMRA , CD45RA ϩ /CCR7 Ϫ ). 10 Aside from their differential expression of CD45RA and other cell surface markers, T EM uniformly exhibit rapid effector functions in response to antigen activation. Further, T EM do not generally require CD28-mediated costimulation or innate cytokines to secrete proinflammatory cytokines or to lyse target cells. 11,12 Thus, if T EM cells are direct descendants of effector CTLs, then the maintenance of effector functions within T EM would suggest early programming during the priming phase of infection.In mice, both IL-12 and IFN-␣/ exert somewhat overlapping and redundant effects by driving effector cell development. 5,[13][14][15][16][17] Although IL-12 seems to be more potent at promoting IFN-␥ secretion, both IL-12 and IFN-␣/ are equally effective at regulating lytic activity in murine CD8 ϩ T cells. In contrast, IL-12 and IFN-␣/ appear to play very distinct roles in priming human CD8 ϩ T-cell responses. Recently, Ramos et al demonstrated a preferential role for IL-12 over IFN-␣/ in driving cytokine expression and lytic activity in human CTLs. 18 Conversely, IFN-␣/ enhanced the development of a subpopulation of cells that displayed phenotypic and functional characteristics of T CM . Programming of effectors by IL-12 was accompanied by progression of cells through cell division and was altered by the strength of TCR engagement. IL-12 programmed effector cell development, which was regulated by induction of the IL-12 receptor at each division as cells proliferated in response to TCR activation. In contrast, IFN-␣/ tended to slow the progression of cell divi...