1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal relationship between the tumor suppressors p53 and BAX in primary colorectal cancers

Abstract: Though most colorectal cancers show allelic losses, a subset of colorectal cancers (microsatellite instability or MSI-positive cancers) develop numerous small insertion and deletion mutations in repetitive DNA. Some of these sequences occur in coding regions of cancer related genes which, when targeted by frameshift mutations, produce truncations in their protein product. Such a gene is the proapoptotic tumor suppressor, BAX, mutated by frameshifts within a polyG sequence in approximately 50% of MSI-positive c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
29
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, the lack of a dependency on bax for p53-dependent apoptosis in these normal cells is the same as was found for normal murine thymocytes following 2.25 Gy of radiation (Knudson et al, 1995). The mutation of bax in colon carcinomas has been suggested to contribute towards the resistance of these tumours to therapy (Rampino et al, 1997;Simms et al, 1998). If this is correct, it has to be assumed from our data in normal murine cells, that either the control of expression and possibly function of bax in the human gut is di erent from the mouse and/or that changes in bax function occur during carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this respect, the lack of a dependency on bax for p53-dependent apoptosis in these normal cells is the same as was found for normal murine thymocytes following 2.25 Gy of radiation (Knudson et al, 1995). The mutation of bax in colon carcinomas has been suggested to contribute towards the resistance of these tumours to therapy (Rampino et al, 1997;Simms et al, 1998). If this is correct, it has to be assumed from our data in normal murine cells, that either the control of expression and possibly function of bax in the human gut is di erent from the mouse and/or that changes in bax function occur during carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This finding leads to the hypothesis that pERK is involved in the mechanism of tumor progression of MMR-proficient CRC and Lynch syndrome by interacting with the wnt signaling pathway and RHAMM: (1) KRAS mutation is found in approximately 35% of unselected CRCs, whereas it is mutated at a particularly low frequency in sporadic MSI-H cancers. [38][39][40][41][42] (2) The molecule ERK, a member of the MAPK pathway, is activated by a cascade of phophorylation events downstream from the ras proto-oncogene. 8 (3) Intracellular and cell surface RHAMM isoforms are important for the activation of ERK by PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor) and mutant (activated) RAS, respectively, while intracellular RHAMMv4 overexpression activates ERK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Mutation in the bax gene has been reported in some colon cancers, the majority of which have a defect in DNA mismatch repair which is readily detected by mutations in repetitive sequences. 15 A reciprocal relationship has been reported between bax and p53 mutational status, 16,17 suggesting that a failure in the p53/bax pathway is of importance for colon tumor cells to escape apoptosis. The low expression of the proapototic Bax protein in most of the colon tumors has been correlated with the poor survival of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%