Abstract:Recruitment of cellular signaling proteins by the CD3 polypeptides of the TCR complex mediates T cell activation. We have screened a human Src homology 3 (SH3) domain phage display library for proteins that can bind to the proline-rich region of CD3ε. This screening identified Eps8L1 (epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 8-like 1) together with the N-terminal SH3 domain of Nck1 and Nck2 as its preferred SH3 partners. Studies with recombinant proteins confirmed strong binding of CD3ε to Eps8L1 and… Show more
“…Another MIRR, FcεRI, generates the activation signal using 2 ITAMs of the FcεRIβ and FcRγ chains. Most of experimental data in the literature reported to date strongly support the distinct rather than redundant functions for the ITAM signaling modules including those located on the different signaling chains 39,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] and those located on the same signaling module (e.g., 3 different ITAMs on TCR ζ chain). 56 Within the SCHOOL model, 10,11,42,43 cytoplasmic homooligomerization controls the ITAM signaling through the different patterns of MIRR signaling subunit homooligomerization 11,43 that produce distinct activation signals provided by different ITAMs.…”
C ell surface receptors function to transduce signals across the cell membrane leading to a variety of biologic responses. Structurally, these integral proteins can be classified into two main families, depending on whether extracellular ligand-binding and intracellular signaling domains are located on the same protein chain (single-chain receptors, SRs) or on separate subunits (multichain receptors, MRs). Since most MRs are immune receptors, they are all commonly referred to as multichain immune recognition receptors (MIRRs). Recent studies reveal that, in contrast to well-structured signaling domains of SRs, those of MIRRs represent intrinsically disordered regions, the regions that lack a well-defined threedimensional structure under physiological conditions. Why did nature separate recognition and signaling functions of MIRRs? Why for MIRRs did nature select to provide highly specific signaling through the chaos of protein disorder? What mechanisms could control this chaos in the process of transmembrane signal transduction to provide the specificity and diversity of the immune response? Here, I summarize recent findings that may not only shed light on these and other questions but also add significantly to our understanding of receptor signaling, a fundamental process that plays a critical role in health and disease.
“…Another MIRR, FcεRI, generates the activation signal using 2 ITAMs of the FcεRIβ and FcRγ chains. Most of experimental data in the literature reported to date strongly support the distinct rather than redundant functions for the ITAM signaling modules including those located on the different signaling chains 39,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] and those located on the same signaling module (e.g., 3 different ITAMs on TCR ζ chain). 56 Within the SCHOOL model, 10,11,42,43 cytoplasmic homooligomerization controls the ITAM signaling through the different patterns of MIRR signaling subunit homooligomerization 11,43 that produce distinct activation signals provided by different ITAMs.…”
C ell surface receptors function to transduce signals across the cell membrane leading to a variety of biologic responses. Structurally, these integral proteins can be classified into two main families, depending on whether extracellular ligand-binding and intracellular signaling domains are located on the same protein chain (single-chain receptors, SRs) or on separate subunits (multichain receptors, MRs). Since most MRs are immune receptors, they are all commonly referred to as multichain immune recognition receptors (MIRRs). Recent studies reveal that, in contrast to well-structured signaling domains of SRs, those of MIRRs represent intrinsically disordered regions, the regions that lack a well-defined threedimensional structure under physiological conditions. Why did nature separate recognition and signaling functions of MIRRs? Why for MIRRs did nature select to provide highly specific signaling through the chaos of protein disorder? What mechanisms could control this chaos in the process of transmembrane signal transduction to provide the specificity and diversity of the immune response? Here, I summarize recent findings that may not only shed light on these and other questions but also add significantly to our understanding of receptor signaling, a fundamental process that plays a critical role in health and disease.
“…The phage library that we used has previously proven its value in identifying high-affinity SH3 partners for a number of cellular and pathogen-encoded ligand proteins (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). These studies have established the positive predictive value of the hits generated by this screening method to be remarkably high, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because these target proteins are expressed in their native form, this system has the potential to explore binding affinity and specificity contributed by contacts provided by the peptide binding interface, as well as more complex and atypical interactions. The binding affinity required for positive identification of a specific interaction in this discovery system is relatively high (estimated to be in the range of 2 to 5 M), as interactions with dissociation constants higher than 5 M are rarely found (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and unpublished observations). Although this may be seen as a technical limitation when considering that many SH3 interactions with established roles in cell biology are weak such an affinity threshold is also a major experimental advantage by filtering out nonspecific background caused by promiscuous low affinity binding that most SH3 domains exhibit toward a variety of proline-rich sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Our earlier work on a variety of individual ligand proteins of interest has established the value of this phage library in identifying SH3-mediated interactions that involve distinct affinity and selectivity (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). In this study we apply recombination-mediated cloning for expression of hundreds of potential SH3 ligand proteins in cultured human cells to identify preferred SH3-mediated interactions among the human proteome in a high throughput manner.…”
The Src Homology-3 (SH3) domains are ubiquitous protein modules that mediate important intracellular protein interactions via binding to short proline-rich consensus motifs in their target proteins. The affinity and specificity of such core SH3 -ligand contacts are typically modest, but additional binding interfaces can give rise to stronger and more specific SH3-mediated interactions. To understand how commonly such robust SH3 interactions occur in the human protein interactome, and to identify these in an unbiased manner we have expressed 324 predicted human SH3 ligands as full-length proteins in mammalian cells, and screened for their preferred SH3 partners using a phage display-based approach. This discovery platform contains an essentially complete repertoire of the ϳ300 human SH3 domains, and involves an inherent binding threshold that ensures selective identification of only SH3 interactions with relatively high affinity. Such strong and selective SH3 partners could be identified for only 19 of these 324 predicted ligand proteins, suggesting that the majority of human SH3 interactions are relatively weak, and thereby have capacity for only modest inherent selectivity. The panel of exceptionally robust SH3 interactions identified here provides a rich source of leads and hypotheses for further studies. However, a truly compre-
“…Intriguingly, mutating BRS causes augmented preTCR signaling but attenuated TCR signaling, demonstrating the complicated roles of BRS in different T cells. The major function of PRS is to recruit Nck via an atypical PxxDY motif that includes the first tyrosine of the ITAM [23,72,73]. CD3ε-Nck binding inhibits the phosphorylation of both ITAM tyrosines, and conversely the tyrosine phosphorylation inhibits CD3ε-Nck interaction.…”
T-cell receptor-CD3 complex (TCR) is a versatile signaling machine that can initiate antigen-specific immune responses based on various biochemical changes of CD3 cytoplasmic domains, but the underlying structural basis remains elusive. Here we developed biophysical approaches to study the conformational dynamics of CD3ε cytoplasmic domain (CD3ε CD ). At the single-molecule level, we found that CD3ε CD could have multiple conformational states with different openness of three functional motifs, i.e., ITAM, BRS and PRS. These conformations were generated because different regions of CD3ε CD had heterogeneous lipid-binding properties and therefore had heterogeneous dynamics. Live-cell imaging experiments demonstrated that different antigen stimulations could stabilize CD3ε CD at different conformations. Lipid-dependent conformational dynamics thus provide structural basis for the versatile signaling property of TCR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.