2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Regulation between Resting Microglial Dynamics and Neuronal Activity In Vivo

Abstract: Microglia are the primary immune cells in the brain. Under physiological conditions, they typically stay in a "resting" state, with ramified processes continuously extending to and retracting from surrounding neural tissues. Whether and how such highly dynamic resting microglia functionally interact with surrounding neurons are still unclear. Using in vivo time-lapse imaging of both microglial morphology and neuronal activity in the optic tectum of larval zebrafish, we found that neuronal activity steers resti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
465
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 480 publications
(504 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
24
465
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained when animals were reared in complete darkness during a critical period of visual cortex development (Tremblay et al, 2010). In contrast, increasing neuronal activity in zebrafish by either glutamate uncaging or repetitive visual stimulation results in increased contact by microglial processes, which preferentially ensheath neurons with high spontaneous calcium transients through a mechanism that likely involves calcium-induced release of ATP from neurons (Li et al, 2012b). Contact by microglial processes was also associated with a subsequent decrease in spontaneous spiking frequency (Li et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Microgliasupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were obtained when animals were reared in complete darkness during a critical period of visual cortex development (Tremblay et al, 2010). In contrast, increasing neuronal activity in zebrafish by either glutamate uncaging or repetitive visual stimulation results in increased contact by microglial processes, which preferentially ensheath neurons with high spontaneous calcium transients through a mechanism that likely involves calcium-induced release of ATP from neurons (Li et al, 2012b). Contact by microglial processes was also associated with a subsequent decrease in spontaneous spiking frequency (Li et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Microgliasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In contrast, increasing neuronal activity in zebrafish by either glutamate uncaging or repetitive visual stimulation results in increased contact by microglial processes, which preferentially ensheath neurons with high spontaneous calcium transients through a mechanism that likely involves calcium-induced release of ATP from neurons (Li et al, 2012b). Contact by microglial processes was also associated with a subsequent decrease in spontaneous spiking frequency (Li et al, 2012b). Therefore, microglia appear to monitor synaptic function and alter their physiological behavior in response to changes in neuronal activity, which in turn can exert influence on the activity properties of contacted neurons.…”
Section: Microgliamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…18 Likewise, numerous studies have demonstrated microglia's own biological identity including the regulation of synaptic pruning and plasticity, [42][43][44] the spatial distribution of axonal projections, 45,46 and neuronal homeostasis and survival. 47,48 Alternatively, a current hypothesis proposes that microglial reactivity may be stimulated by damaged neurons with deficient signaling, the presence of circulatory plasma molecules in the CNS due to the BBB disruption, and peripheral leukocyte signaling mediated by cytokines after interactions with microbes or their antigens. 24 Major efforts in specifically dissecting the biology of microglia should focused on using epigenomics, comparative transcriptomics, proteomics, and other multidimensional technologies such as computational biology and 2-photon imaging.…”
Section: States Of Existencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since PGE 2 mediates the effect of repeated stress in attenuating mPFC dopaminergic activity [9], it is suggested that microglia regulate mPFC functions indirectly through PGE 2 and dopamine signaling. On the other hand, recent studies using in vivo brain imaging and electron microscopy, combined with mice deficient in microglial functions, have suggested a direct action of microglia on neurons for their functional and structural remodeling [15][16][17][18][19]. Since several groups including ours have reported that repeated stress induces microglial activation in various brain areas including the mPFC [9,11,[20][21][22], it is speculated that stressactivated microglia can directly affect functions of mPFC neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%