2004
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200300689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Donor Acceptor Selectivity (RDAS) and Paulsen’s Concept of “Match” in Saccharide Coupling

Abstract: Three modes of selectivity — enantio, stereo, and regio — are critically important for efficient organic synthesis. In the sub‐domain of oligosaccharide synthesis, the first is (usually!) irrelevant in view of the chiralities of the reacting partners. The challenge posed by the other two is compounded by the reality that “protecting groups” are the major, if not only, instruments by which control can be exercised. The role that O2 protecting groups play in stereocontrol of coupling reactions was formulated 60 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[119a] Rationalization of these regioselectivities led to the birth of the concept of reciprocal donor-acceptor selectivity (RDAS), [120] which is related to the concept of donor/acceptor matching introduced by Paulsen. [5] The versatility of NPOE donors was further demonstrated recently in the efficient assembly of a pentadecamannan.…”
Section: 2-orthoesters Of Aldosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[119a] Rationalization of these regioselectivities led to the birth of the concept of reciprocal donor-acceptor selectivity (RDAS), [120] which is related to the concept of donor/acceptor matching introduced by Paulsen. [5] The versatility of NPOE donors was further demonstrated recently in the efficient assembly of a pentadecamannan.…”
Section: 2-orthoesters Of Aldosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect could explain the lower degree of glycosylation of hydroxyl groups with either no possible or favorable hydrogen bond assistance described in the literature. That could be the case of the higher ratio of glycosylation of hydroxyl groups at C3 position even being the most hindered one, compared to OH-2 in α-altrose diol acceptor derivatives described by Fraser-Reid et al [66]. This fact could also explain the glycosylation tendency of the axial hydroxyl group at C1 versus C2 in D-chiro-inositol 1,2-syn diol acceptors [54].…”
Section: Superarmed Glycosyl Donors In Glycosylation Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The authors observed that when differently protected 1,2-diols, derived from both chiroinositol enantiomers, are used as acceptors, both the absolute configuration of the acceptor as well as the nature of the donor's and acceptor's protecting groups plays a key role in the regiochemistry of the coupling. A few examples of regioselective glycosylation of 1,2-cis-axial/equatorial [51,62,63] and 1,2-trans-diequatorial diols [51,53,64] have been described, and the influence of the donor's protecting groups on the regiochemistry of polyol glycosylation has been investigated [65,66]. A notable example of regioselective glycosylation of 1,2-trans-diequatorial diol is the virtually complete regioselective galactosylation of the OH-4 group of p-methoxyphenyl 6-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-2-tetrachlorophthalimido-β-D-glucopyranoside 137 (Fig.…”
Section: Regio-and Stereoselectivity In Glycosylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Reciprocal Donor Acceptor Selectivity (RDAS) definition has been recently introduced. 24 In our laboratory, we have extensively employed the trichloroacetimidate method 25 for β-galactofuranosyl linkages construction 26,27 allowing the synthesis of internal D-Galf-containing oligosaccharides. 28,29 In order to study this methodology in the α-galactofuranosyl linkage construction, a straightfoward synthesis of 1 is needed, that after imidate activation, would allow further glycosylation studies with different acceptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%