Recidivism rates following firearm injury as determined by a collaborative hospital and law enforcement database

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recidivism is a key outcome measure for injury prevention programs. Firearm injury recidivism rates are difficult to determine because of poor longitudinal follow-up and incomplete, disparate databases. Reported recidivism rates from trauma registries are 2% to 3%. We created a collaborative database merging law enforcement, emergency department, and inpatient trauma registry data to more accurately determine rates of recidivism in patients presenting to our trauma center following firearm injury. METHODS A collaborative database for Jefferson County, Kentucky, was constructed to include violent firearm injuries encountered by the trauma center or law enforcement from 2008 to 2019. Iterative deterministic data linkage was used to create the database and eliminate redundancies. From patients with at least one hospital encounter, raw recidivism rates were calculated by dividing the number of patients injured at least twice by the total number of patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors for recidivism. The cumulative incidence of recidivism over time was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier survival model. RESULTS There were 2, 363 assault-type firearm injuries with at least 1 hospital encounter, approximately 9% of which did not survive their initial encounter. The collaborative database demonstrated raw recidivism rates for assault-type firearm injuries of 9.5% compared with 2.5% from the trauma registry alone. Risk factors were young age, male sex, and African American race. The predicted incidence of recidivism was 3.6%, 5.6%, 11.4%, and 15.8% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Both hospital and law enforcement data are critical for determining reinjury rates in patients treated at trauma centers. Recidivism rates following violent firearm injury are four times higher using a collaborative database compared with the inpatient trauma registry alone. Predicted incidence of recidivism at 10 years was at least 16% for all patients, with high-risk subgroups experiencing rates as high as 26%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, level III.

A new pandemic and an old epidemic: The impact of COVID-19 and gun violence as measured by years of potential life lost in a US city

“…Following institutional review board approval from the University of Louisville (including approval to conduct the research without obtaining the subject's written HIPAA authorization), data from the Jefferson County Collaborative Firearm Injury Database (designed and maintained by the University of Louisville Department of Surgery and Trauma Institute) was reviewed, including all firearm injuries between January 2011 and December 2021. This database captures all gun violence incidents in Louisville, KY and includes patients seen at the regions only American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified adult level one trauma center (including both patients admitted to the hospital and those evaluated and released from the emergency department) and victims of firearm injury encountered by the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department (10). Demographic information for the database was obtained via patient self-reporting and electronic health records.…”

A modified two-process Knox test for investigating the relationship between law enforcement opioid seizures and overdoses

“…Despite these limitations, the results highlight the importance of public health and police partnerships in addressing the opioid epidemic. Police can play an integral part in promoting public health, and this has occurred most recently in the overdose epidemic through training and co-response efforts for individuals with behavioural health concerns [43], violence prevention initiatives [44][45][46] and numerous multisector coalitions. Yet these results suggest the need for a rapid community response following drug seizures; this response would need to target harm reduction and treatment opportunities to a specific geographical region.…”

Increases in Violence and Changes in Trauma Admissions During the COVID Quarantine

“…15 With injury recidivism rates as high as 55%, the current escalation of violent trauma during this time will likely have long-lasting implications for trauma centers in the future. 16 As the frontline of violence in the United States, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recognizes trauma centers need hospital-based violence intervention programs to address the ongoing violence epidemic that has been drastically exacerbated by our current socioeconomic climate.…”