Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1080/07060661.2013.768296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recessive and dominant genes confer resistance toColletotrichum truncatumin cultivated lentil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lentis could be a site of sRNA synthesis, that by one of the cited mechanisms could contribute to different pathogenicity of the two races, Ct0 and Ct1. Lentil accessions resistant to one or both races exist [ 8 , 21 ] and resistance genes against race Ct1 have been identified likely governed by the well known gene-for-gene interaction [ 36 ]. How fungal small RNA affects this interaction needs further investigation and is best carried out in a well characterized host-pathogen system amendable to gene recombination and genetic manipulation of one or both organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lentis could be a site of sRNA synthesis, that by one of the cited mechanisms could contribute to different pathogenicity of the two races, Ct0 and Ct1. Lentil accessions resistant to one or both races exist [ 8 , 21 ] and resistance genes against race Ct1 have been identified likely governed by the well known gene-for-gene interaction [ 36 ]. How fungal small RNA affects this interaction needs further investigation and is best carried out in a well characterized host-pathogen system amendable to gene recombination and genetic manipulation of one or both organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These markers also were linked to a resistance locus in variety 'Indianhead'. The resistance loci are most likely CtR4 in PI320937 and CtR3 in 'Indianhead' described in the genetic study above (Buchwaldt et al, 2013). Simultaneously, Tar'an et al (2003) demonstrated the usefulness of markerassisted selection using a bi-parental F 7 population from a cross between varieties 'CDC Robin' (derived from 'Indianhead') with anthracnose resistance and breeding line 946a-46 (derived from accession ILL5588) with ascochyta resistance (Ford et al, 1999).…”
Section: Genetics Of Anthracnose Resistancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…A genetic study of inheritance showed that resistance to race Ct1 in L. culinaris 'Indianhead', PI320937 and PI345629 is conferred by a combination of recessive and dominant genes. So far, two recessive genes, ctr1 and ctr2, and three dominant genes, CtR3, CtR4 and CtR5, have been identified (Buchwaldt et al, 2013). Progenies in F 1 , F 2 , BC 1 and F 3 derived from crosses between each of the resistant lines and the susceptible cultivar, 'Eston', demonstrate that 'Indianhead' has one recessive and one dominant gene (ctr1, CtR3), PI345629 also has one recessive and one dominant gene (ctr2, CtR5) that are different from those in 'Indianhead', while PI320937 has a single dominant gene (CtR4) that is different from the others (Buchwaldt et al, 2013).…”
Section: Genetics Of Anthracnose Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LCt-2 resistance locus was tagged with two fl anking RAPD markers at 6.4 and 10.5 cm ; in addition, three AFLP markers were also found to be linked to this locus (Tar'an et al 2003 ). However, most recently Buchwaldt et al ( 2013 ) have established that resistance to Ct1 race is controlled by two recessive genes ( lct-1 and lct-2 ) and three closely linked dominant genes .…”
Section: Biotic Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%