1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00218412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptor sites for amino acids in the facial taste system of the channel catfish

Abstract: 1. Receptor sites for different amino acids in the facial taste system of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, were determined from in vivo electrophysiological cross-adaptation experiments. 2. Relatively independent receptor sites were indicated for L-proline, D-proline, D-arginine, L-histidine and L-lysine, as well as those previously reported for L-alanine, L-arginine and D-alanine. 3. The functional isolation of two nerve twigs that were more responsive to D-alanine than to L-alanine or to other test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, fish detect amino acids not only by T1R1/3 but also by multiple T1R2/3s. This is consistent with the experimental data that fish have multiple amino acid receptors in their taste systems (Kanwal et al, 1987;Wegert and Caprio, 1991;Finger et al, 1996;Caprio, 1999, 2000). The finding that the receptors of L-Ala and L-Arg exist in different taste cells of channel catfish (Finger et al, 1996) may be explained by the existence of T1R1/3 and T1R2/3, although some reports suggest the existence of the ligandgated ion channel in channel catfish as the L-Arg receptor (Teeter et al, 1990;Grosvenor et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, fish detect amino acids not only by T1R1/3 but also by multiple T1R2/3s. This is consistent with the experimental data that fish have multiple amino acid receptors in their taste systems (Kanwal et al, 1987;Wegert and Caprio, 1991;Finger et al, 1996;Caprio, 1999, 2000). The finding that the receptors of L-Ala and L-Arg exist in different taste cells of channel catfish (Finger et al, 1996) may be explained by the existence of T1R1/3 and T1R2/3, although some reports suggest the existence of the ligandgated ion channel in channel catfish as the L-Arg receptor (Teeter et al, 1990;Grosvenor et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such a fixed order of stimulus efficacies was found also in Tau sensitive cells in Panulirus argus (Fuzessery et al 1978) and in Arg cells in crayfish dactyl chemoreceptors (Bauer et al 1981) and may imply a single broadly tuned receptor. Overall our results of multiple, independent receptors speak against the idea of a few broadly tuned receptor sites for basic and neutral amino acids as argued from studies in catfish (Bruch and Rulli 1988;Caprio et al 1989;Wegert and Caprio 1991).…”
Section: Hyp-best Cell Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In addition, crossadaptation experiments have revealed a 'generalized reduction effect', in which there is always some basal reduction in the response to a chemical following adaptation to any other chemical. In the taste and olfactory systems of catfish, this generalized reduction effect is usually between 10-50%, and occurs even if the two compounds mediate their excitatory effects through different receptor sites (Caprio and Byrd 1984;Bryant et al 1989;Wegert and Caprio 1991;Michel et al 1993b). A similar generalized reduction effect during cross-adaptation experiments has been observed in taste and olfaction in clawed lobsters Johnson et al 1989) and olfaction in spiny lobsters (Daniel et al 1994).…”
Section: Physiological Correlates Of Binding Inhibition Between Mixtumentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Cross-adaptation experiments on chemosensory systems of a number of species have been used to identify specific compounds that cause cross-adaptational reduction in responses due to competitiv e binding to the same receptor sites Wegert and Caprio 1991;Michel et al 1993b). In addition, crossadaptation experiments have revealed a 'generalized reduction effect', in which there is always some basal reduction in the response to a chemical following adaptation to any other chemical.…”
Section: Physiological Correlates Of Binding Inhibition Between Mixtumentioning
confidence: 99%