Air Quality Management 1997
DOI: 10.1039/9781847550101-00095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptor modeling for air quality management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
106
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…PCA attempts to capture the maximum amount of variation in the data set, whereas PMF tries to solve the mass balance equation with positive constraints on the mass contributions. PMF also accounts for the uncertainty in each data point as opposed to the overall uncertainty of the fitted model (18). In summary, the PCA and PMF features are not the same.…”
Section: Receptor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCA attempts to capture the maximum amount of variation in the data set, whereas PMF tries to solve the mass balance equation with positive constraints on the mass contributions. PMF also accounts for the uncertainty in each data point as opposed to the overall uncertainty of the fitted model (18). In summary, the PCA and PMF features are not the same.…”
Section: Receptor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the sources of this complex mixture of ambient PM is important because PM has been shown to have adverse effects on human health, degrade visibility, increase the acidity of lakes and streams, damage materials and crops, and impact global climate (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 2009a). Linking sources to ambient PM concentrations and ultimately to health effects and visibility degradation is achieved, in part, by understanding the chemical composition of atmospheric PM and how it varies temporally and spatially (e.g., Hopke, 1991;Schauer et al, 1996;Hopke, 2003;Brook et al, 2004;Watson et al, 2008;Solomon et al, 2012). However, near the end of the 20th century detailed information on particle composition was lacking for many locations around the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] This paper intends to address the following question: "How well can we identify and quantify source contributions using receptor models?" Except for historical and exemplary purposes, this paper limits its investigation to work published since 2000, with a focus on PM source apportionment in the vicinity of the Supersite cities of Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Fresno, CA; Houston, TX; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY; Pittsburgh, PA; and St. Louis, MO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%