45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptivity of Hypersonic Boundary Layers to Acoustic and Vortical Disturbances (Invited)

Abstract: Boundary-layer receptivity to two-dimensional acoustic and vortical disturbances for hypersonic flows over two-dimensional and axi-symmetric geometries were numerically investigated. The role of bluntness, wall cooling, and pressure gradients on the receptivity and stability were analyzed and compared with the sharp nose cases. It was found that for flows over sharp nose geometries in adiabatic wall conditions the instability waves are generated in the leading-edge region and that the boundary layer is much mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(78 reference statements)
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The respective gains are summarized in table 2. Firstly, the slow acoustic waves yielded a gain ≈1.9 times greater than that of the fast acoustic waves, which corroborates the general understanding that slow waves dominate acoustically induced transition onset in adiabatic-wall high-speed boundary layers (MZ3; Balakumar 2015). Vortical waves yielded a gain nearly identical to G c all , suggesting that transient streamwise jets excited by vortical disturbances is the dominant receptivity mechanism for the current configuration.…”
Section: Optimal Global Receptivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The respective gains are summarized in table 2. Firstly, the slow acoustic waves yielded a gain ≈1.9 times greater than that of the fast acoustic waves, which corroborates the general understanding that slow waves dominate acoustically induced transition onset in adiabatic-wall high-speed boundary layers (MZ3; Balakumar 2015). Vortical waves yielded a gain nearly identical to G c all , suggesting that transient streamwise jets excited by vortical disturbances is the dominant receptivity mechanism for the current configuration.…”
Section: Optimal Global Receptivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…20 show the results for the sharp cone Cases 1, 2, and 3 and Figs.21 and 24show the results for the blunt cone Cases 4 and 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The receptivity process in hypersonic flows has been investigated for flow over flat plates, wedges, and cones at different flow conditions. 20 It was found that amplitudes of the instability waves generated by the slow acoustic freestream disturbances are about 3-5 times the amplitude of the freestream disturbances. The next part of the problem is to determine criteria that can be used to estimate the transition onset point.…”
Section: Secondary Instability and Breakdown To Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For flows over flat plates and sharp cones, this work has been extended to predict that slow acoustic waves in the free-stream, outside of the shock, are the most important waves for activation of the Mack mode. However, free-stream vortical waves also play a role, and can also activate modal boundary layer growth [14][15][16]. Recent experiments involving schlieren imaging of Mach 6 flow over ogive-cylinder geometries revealed the presence of low-frequency instabilities in addition to the highfrequency Mack 2 nd mode [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%