2008
DOI: 10.2143/ls.33.1.2034334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptive Ecumenism and Ecclesial Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the members of ARCIC continue to develop fresh strategies for seeking to serve this need (Murray 2011, 205-206). It is in direct relation to this context and its challenges, and in creative continuity with the work of ARCIC, that the strategy which has come to be referred to as 'receptive ecumenism' has been devised and tested as charting a way for contemporary ecumenism (Murray 2008a(Murray , 2008b(Murray , 2015Murray and Murray 2012). It proceeds by bringing to the fore the dispositions of self-critical hospitality, humble learning, and ongoing conversion that have always been quietly essential to good ecumenical work and by turning them into the explicit required strategy and core task of contemporary ecumenism.…”
Section: Achievements and Limits Of Traditional Bilateral Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the members of ARCIC continue to develop fresh strategies for seeking to serve this need (Murray 2011, 205-206). It is in direct relation to this context and its challenges, and in creative continuity with the work of ARCIC, that the strategy which has come to be referred to as 'receptive ecumenism' has been devised and tested as charting a way for contemporary ecumenism (Murray 2008a(Murray , 2008b(Murray , 2015Murray and Murray 2012). It proceeds by bringing to the fore the dispositions of self-critical hospitality, humble learning, and ongoing conversion that have always been quietly essential to good ecumenical work and by turning them into the explicit required strategy and core task of contemporary ecumenism.…”
Section: Achievements and Limits Of Traditional Bilateral Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the members of ARCIC continue to develop fresh strategies for seeking to serve this need (Murray 2011, 205-206). It is in direct relation to this context and its challenges, and in creative continuity with the work of ARCIC, that the strategy which has come to be referred to as 'receptive ecumenism' has been devised and tested as charting a way for contemporary ecumenism (Murray 2008a(Murray , 2008b(Murray , 2015Murray and Murray 2012). It proceeds by bringing to the fore the dispositions of self-critical hospitality, humble learning, and ongoing conversion that have always been quietly essential to good ecumenical work and by turning them into the explicit required strategy and core task of contemporary ecumenism.…”
Section: Achievements and Limits Of Traditional Bilateral Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 He attests that RE emphasizes the 'need' for churches 'to walk the way of conversion towards more visible structural and sacramental unity'. 54 However, it is still to be determined whether Murray and Couturier use the term 'conversion' in the same manner. While RE has a pneumatological focus, 55 it may need to be expressed more explicitly, a point that will be considered in more detail later.…”
Section: Links Between Receptive Ecumenism and Spiritual Ecumenism: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, RE is designed to complement, rather than replace, existing ecumenical methodologies. 101 That being said, how does RE fit with SE?…”
Section: Understanding Receptive Ecumenism In Relation To Spiritual Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation