2013
DOI: 10.4324/9781315016061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reception Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the immense personal influence of the director and other key creative production team members, audience studies and reception theory scholars have argued that audience members ultimately determine how a text is received and how its ultimate meaning is constructed (Holub, 2013; Jauss & Benzinger, 1970; McQuail, 1997). A film’s audience is ostensibly composed of a heterogeneous group of individuals who carry their own perspectives and biases into the theatre, consuming the content individually and subjectively.…”
Section: Interpretive Communities: Users and Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the immense personal influence of the director and other key creative production team members, audience studies and reception theory scholars have argued that audience members ultimately determine how a text is received and how its ultimate meaning is constructed (Holub, 2013; Jauss & Benzinger, 1970; McQuail, 1997). A film’s audience is ostensibly composed of a heterogeneous group of individuals who carry their own perspectives and biases into the theatre, consuming the content individually and subjectively.…”
Section: Interpretive Communities: Users and Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus television is responsible for shaping, or 'cultivating' viewer's conceptions of social reality. Reception analysis theory embodies how consumers interpret, read, decode, produce, perceive and use media materials (Holub, 2013). It illuminates how meanings circulate within social contexts while at the same time the theory investigates the process of interaction between unmediated messages and codes such as animated cartoons and their audience in this study; children.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(That is, the rivals disagree about whether δ or ε is a constitutive part of the tradendum , and if neither δ or ε is a constitutive part of the tradendum , then both rivals have thoroughly misunderstood the true meaning of the tradition material.) Reception theory offers a good reason to favour the model of a living tradition in this regard: tradition materials are polysemic, just like texts in the narrow sense of the word; they lack a discrete and objective structure of signification (Eco, 1979; Holub, 1984). Thus, the meaning of a tradition material (or text) is pre-structured, but not entirely pre-determined, by its originator (or author).…”
Section: Dynamic Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%