“…Other studies have tried to relate the reception zones with the technical action of reception, or different K1 variables (Callejón & Hernández, 2009;Rentero et al, 2015). That has been attempted by reporting on the frequencies in the reception zones, associating the reception zones with the roles of the receiving players (Lima et al, 2008;Maia & Mesquita, 2006), with the reception technique (Paulo et al, 2016), the setting zone (Afonso et al, 2012;João et al, 2006), the sending zone for the setting (González- , the role of the attacking player (Marcelino et al, 2014), the attack time (Afonso et al, 2010;Rocha et al, 2021), with other elements of the game through a map of interactions with centroids (Hurst et al, 2016;Laporta et al, 2018) or social network análisis (Rocha et al, 2021), the reception performance (Afonso et al, 2017;Carrero et al, 2017;João & Pires, 2015;Maia & Mesquita, 2006;Paulo et al, 2016), the reception performance contextualized with the rotation of the receiving team (López et al, 2022) and the effect of attack (Rocha et al, 2021).…”