2006
DOI: 10.3406/bspf.2006.13396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Récents acquis sur la circulation préhistorique de l'obsidienne en Corse

Abstract: Obsidian represents one of the best markers for exchanges between prehistoric communities. In the Western Mediterranean, Corsica has a particular situation: although more than 100 km from the nearest obsidian source, the island received important quantities of obsidian, especially during the 4th millennium BC. Indeed, for that period, there were thousands of these obsidian items, which represent more than 75% of the lithic artefacts of each assemblage studied. The available data show that Corsican communities … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Corsica, except for one sample (Salotti et al, 2000), all Neolithic provenance studies pointed toward Sardinia for the origin of archaeological obsidians, as reviewed by Costa (2006; see also Bressy et al, 2008;Paolini-Saez et al, in press). It was therefore important to determine as precisely as possible the accessibility and internal variability of this raw material's elemental composition for each of this island's sources.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Corsica, except for one sample (Salotti et al, 2000), all Neolithic provenance studies pointed toward Sardinia for the origin of archaeological obsidians, as reviewed by Costa (2006; see also Bressy et al, 2008;Paolini-Saez et al, in press). It was therefore important to determine as precisely as possible the accessibility and internal variability of this raw material's elemental composition for each of this island's sources.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It must in effect be reminded that the Lipari obsidians were principally 'exported' as laminar products (Ammerman et al, 1990;Tykot et al, 2005b) obtained by pressure (Lugliè , 2009). (2001); 2, Weiss (1984); 3, Magdeleine and Ottaviani (1986); 4, Sicurani (2008); 5, Bressy et al (2008); 6, Costa (2001); 7, Bontempi (1999); 8, Magdeleine (1995); 9, Nebbia and Ottaviani (1993); 10, Tramoni and Chessa (1998);11 Camps (1988); 12, Marini et al (2007); 13, Costa (2006); 14, Radi and Bovenzi (2007) …”
Section: A Fuata Obsidians In Their Regional Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8000 to 6000 B.P.) Weiss, 1972, 1977;Pêche-Quilichini and Bertocco, economic connections between Corsica and Sardinia (Costa, 2006;Le Bourdonnec et al, 2011). However, the first human presence in the Lavezzi archipelago is believed to have occurred during Chalcolithic time (ca.…”
Section: Study Area and Archaeological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless, it is unlikely that each Stentinello settlement in Sicily had a person with the expertise and esoteric knowledge required to create such wide pressure flaked blades (see Pélegrin, 2012), a situation mirroring other Neolithic contexts in Corsica and the Aegean, where scholars have argued for the presence of skilled itinerant knappers who moved from village to village offering their services (Costa, 2006;Perlès, 1990). While the presence of itinerant knappers in Sicily is possible, more data from a wider cross section of well-excavated sites are needed to properly test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Consumption Of Lipari Obsidian In Eastern Sicilymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A central conclusion drawn from these analyses is that multiple knapping traditions existed across the West Mediterranean region over the course of the Neolithic, including pressure-flaked blade industries in southern France and Corsica (Bressy et al, 2008;Costa, 2006;Léa, 2012), direct percussion blade technology in southern Italy (Diamond and Ammerman, 1985), and flake-based industries in Sardinia (Freund, 2014;Lugliè et al, 2008). Nevertheless, these conclusions are based on a small number of total analyses and there is still much work to be done in terms of understanding how and where obsidian was acquired, reduced, and consequently used.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 98%