2006
DOI: 10.1598/jaal.49.8.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recentering the Middle School Classroom as a Vibrant Learning Community: Students, Literacy, and Technology Intersect

Abstract: Technology reshapes our thinking about learning in multiple ways. This article proposes that middle school students can use asynchronous online discussions to improve their responses to literature, increase their engagement with the classroom community, and recenter the classroom around student voices. Working in small groups, students read the same novel. They are prompted to post their responses to the young adult literature in a closed, egalitarian online network. The authors examined online transcripts, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Digitized text not only afforded an enhanced reading experience, through the presence of scaffolds and supports, but also provided a malleable reading environment where students could annotate the text through digital thinkmarks and highlights to capture fleeting thoughts and responses. The asynchronous message board also provided an archival space where students could thoughtfully, through written discourse, create dialogue and response (Grisham & Wolsey, 2006 (Larson, 2009). While all participants in the study were proficient readers and strong communicators, they too benefited from the extra thinking time provided by the asynchronous format to formulate and post responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digitized text not only afforded an enhanced reading experience, through the presence of scaffolds and supports, but also provided a malleable reading environment where students could annotate the text through digital thinkmarks and highlights to capture fleeting thoughts and responses. The asynchronous message board also provided an archival space where students could thoughtfully, through written discourse, create dialogue and response (Grisham & Wolsey, 2006 (Larson, 2009). While all participants in the study were proficient readers and strong communicators, they too benefited from the extra thinking time provided by the asynchronous format to formulate and post responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classroom studies posit that online literature discussions may foster literacy skills, strengthen communication, and build community (Carico, Logan, & Labbo, 2004;Evans & Po, 2007;Grisham & Wolsey, 2006, Larson, 2009Maples, 2010;McWilliams, Hickey, Hines, Conner & Bishop, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion boards provide students with opportunities for autonomous studentdirected discussion and learning, whereas, within the classroom, teacher-directed learning may be the norm (Grisham & Wolsey, 2006). In a study by Grisham and Wolsey (2006), students engaged in an online discussion board as the whole class read a book.…”
Section: Technology and Reading Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion boards provide students with opportunities for autonomous studentdirected discussion and learning, whereas, within the classroom, teacher-directed learning may be the norm (Grisham & Wolsey, 2006). In a study by Grisham and Wolsey (2006), students engaged in an online discussion board as the whole class read a book. The authors of this study replaced traditional classroom strategies and methods, such as Literature Circles, where students share their ideas on books with each other in small groups, with the discussion boards.…”
Section: Technology and Reading Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation