2015
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2476470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Updates to the AE9/AP9/SPM Radiation Belt and Space Plasma Specification Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the MOBE‐DIC model (Hands et al, ) models the worst case environment for internal charging for 3≤ L ≤8 and energies in the range 0.5 to 3 MeV. Recently, the AE9 model (Ginet et al, ; Johnston et al, , ) has been developed. AE9 is based on more data sets, including more modern ones, than AE8, has better spatial resolution, and includes quantification of the uncertainty due to the dynamic behavior of the radiation belts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the MOBE‐DIC model (Hands et al, ) models the worst case environment for internal charging for 3≤ L ≤8 and energies in the range 0.5 to 3 MeV. Recently, the AE9 model (Ginet et al, ; Johnston et al, , ) has been developed. AE9 is based on more data sets, including more modern ones, than AE8, has better spatial resolution, and includes quantification of the uncertainty due to the dynamic behavior of the radiation belts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest and most significant effort in this area has been the development of a successor to the historic AE-8 model. AE-9 [6] is a complex statistical model based on a large number of data sets. AE-9 can be run in different modes, in terms of how statistical fluctuations due to instrumental uncertainties and space weather, are treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the realistic electron flux around the inner radiation belt, we can assume that there is no contribution from electrons. According to the AE9/AP9 empirical model (Johnston et al., 2015), the high‐energy proton (>30 MeV) flux at an altitude of 1,000 km is estimated to be 10–100 #/min/cm 2 . The model also shows that the flux of the high‐energy electrons (>5 MeV) is negligible.…”
Section: Proton Measurement By Hisakimentioning
confidence: 99%