Abstract:Epidural blood patch (EBP) is the injection of autologous blood into the epidural space with the intent of sealing off a dural tear and stopping the leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). EBP may cause an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) due to the mass effect of the injected blood volume, causing CSF from the spinal compartment to enter the intracranial compartment. EBP is usually considered in the management of moderate to severe headache (HA) attributed to low CSF pressure, such as post-dural punctur… Show more
“…Other factors associated with PDPH include low BMI and utility of 14-gauge non-pencil point needle [ 4 ]. While PDPH usually lasts two weeks or less and is self-resolving, its presence can dramatically affect patients’ livelihoods [ 5 ]. Treatment for PDPH ranges from conservative (fluids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), caffeine) to invasive (EBP), which can be pursued earlier if symptomatology is dramatic or conservative measures are not effective [ 6 ].…”
Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) have been an invaluable resource in treating chronic pain pathologies such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain, and leg ischemia. Postdural puncture headaches (PDPH) are a common phenomenon that happens when the dura is compromised. It has been seen with permanent SCS placement, but less commonly reported with SCS trail leads. We present a case of a patient who developed PDPH symptoms, not after initial trial leads placement but upon their removal. This case not only illustrates that dural compromise can occur when the placement of the leads is correct with confirmatory imaging, but also the leads themselves can contribute to masking the defect.
“…Other factors associated with PDPH include low BMI and utility of 14-gauge non-pencil point needle [ 4 ]. While PDPH usually lasts two weeks or less and is self-resolving, its presence can dramatically affect patients’ livelihoods [ 5 ]. Treatment for PDPH ranges from conservative (fluids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), caffeine) to invasive (EBP), which can be pursued earlier if symptomatology is dramatic or conservative measures are not effective [ 6 ].…”
Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) have been an invaluable resource in treating chronic pain pathologies such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain, and leg ischemia. Postdural puncture headaches (PDPH) are a common phenomenon that happens when the dura is compromised. It has been seen with permanent SCS placement, but less commonly reported with SCS trail leads. We present a case of a patient who developed PDPH symptoms, not after initial trial leads placement but upon their removal. This case not only illustrates that dural compromise can occur when the placement of the leads is correct with confirmatory imaging, but also the leads themselves can contribute to masking the defect.
“…It is important to note that although the novel use of fluoroscopy for prophylactic blood patches can be a safe and effective treatment option for the appropriate patient, it like all procedures does not come without risks. A recent update on EBP (14) discusses the common adverse effects of this procedure which can include headache, backache, neck pain, radicular irritation by blood by-products, and a mild pyretic reaction. Specific to backache, reports indicate an incidence of approximately 80% with resolution by 4 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rebound intracranial hypertension (RIH), caused by an increase in CSF pressure by closure of the CSF leak by the EBP, can also occur and present with headache that is worse in the supine position. If RIH were to occur, the associated headache is often transient and can be treated with acetazolamide or topiramate (14). It is for these reasons why it behooves pain physicians to include in their discussion with patients when obtaining written informed consent for an EBP, a discussion on the risks, benefits, common complications, and alternative treatments in regards to PDPH prevention and treatment.…”
Background: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is a known gold standard in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). However, there are no known reports in the literature to date that discuss a fluoroscopy-guided single-shot approach of EBP administration immediately following a lumbar puncture (LP). Case Report: The patient is a 71-year-old man with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy that presented with a history of debilitating PDPH following recurrent LPs that were required for lab monitoring. The patient underwent a single-shot LP followed by an EBP via the same needle prior to removal from the skin. The patient was free of any PDPH symptoms immediately postprocedure and on follow-up. Conclusions: A single-shot fluoroscopy-guided approach of administering an EBP immediately after an LP, but prior to needle removal from the skin, may be a safe and efficient approach for preventing PDPH in applicable patient populations. Key words: Post-dural puncture headache, epidural blood patch, fluoroscopy, lumbar puncture, case report
“…Treatment for PDPH ranges from conservative to invasive measures. In general, PDPH has a benign course, arising usually 24 to 48 hours after dural compromise and is self-limiting (8). Bed rest and hydration tend to be sufficient until its resolution, which tends to occur 2 weeks or less after dural compromise (5,11).…”
Background: Neuraxial procedures have the risk of causing dural compromise that leads to postdural puncture headaches (PDPH). PDPH is normally treated conservatively with oral agents, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and caffeine, or invasively with epidural blood patches (EBP). There is a paucity of evidence for the use of lumbar EBP in cases where the suspected chronic dural defect is at the cervical level. Case Report: A 47-year-old patient who underwent C4-C6 posterior extension of fusion as well as right-sided C5-C6 foraminotomy subsequently developed chronic PDPH symptoms that were refractory to conservative interventions. A lumbar EBP was performed for suspected cervical dura compromise, with near-immediate resolution of symptoms that lasted for multiple months. Conclusion: Lumbar EBP should be considered in patients with suspected PDPH from cervical dural compromise, especially in the context of a prolonged clinical course or failure of conservative means. Key words: Case report, cervical dura compromise, lumbar epidural patch, postdural puncture headache
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.