2018
DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Trends in the Selection of Remedies for Groundwater, Soil, and Sediment at Superfund Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhanced in situ bioremediation (EISB) of chlorinated solvents, including the widespread groundwater contaminants tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE), is an effective remedy implemented at numerous sites. Chlorinated solvents, however, rarely occur in isolation and co-contaminants can negatively impact bioremediation. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of emerging contaminants that are constituents of a variety of products, including firefighting aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs). AFFFs have been used to extinguish fires fed by waste fuels and solvents, leading to corelease of PCE, TCE, and PFAS to soil and groundwater. , Groundwater plumes associated with AFFF use have documented source area total PFAS concentrations as high as 7.09 mg/L. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced in situ bioremediation (EISB) of chlorinated solvents, including the widespread groundwater contaminants tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE), is an effective remedy implemented at numerous sites. Chlorinated solvents, however, rarely occur in isolation and co-contaminants can negatively impact bioremediation. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of emerging contaminants that are constituents of a variety of products, including firefighting aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs). AFFFs have been used to extinguish fires fed by waste fuels and solvents, leading to corelease of PCE, TCE, and PFAS to soil and groundwater. , Groundwater plumes associated with AFFF use have documented source area total PFAS concentrations as high as 7.09 mg/L. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P&T has been the most widely used option for the remediation of contaminated sites since the 1980s [20]. However, it suffers from several shortcomings and disadvantages, which have been extensively addressed in the literature [20,25,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. P&T has very high operational costs that must be incurred for several years, often decades [20,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increasing use of in situ remediation techniques [4], many P&T systems are still installed and operating all over the world, either as the only remediation intervention implemented at a contaminated site, or for plume control in association with other technologies. According to Pobodnik and Horst [5], an estimate of P&T systems operating in USA in 1997 was 45,508 treating plants on 217,176 contaminated sites (around 21% of the total).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%