Recent Trends in Research Methods in Library and Information Science : Content Analysis of the Journal Articles

이명희,

doi:10.4275/kslis.2002.36.3.287

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ullah and Ameen (2018) developed an account of methods used in LIS research through a systematic review. The use of methodologies has been explored in LIS literature originating from a country or a region such as research published in Spain (Cano 1999), Africa (Ngulube, Mokwatlo and Ndwandwe 2009;Alemna and Badu 1994), Turkey (Yontar and Yalvac 2000), Arab countries (Ibrahim 2021), China (Lou et al 2021), and Korea (Lee 2002). In recent years, three articles have been published from Pakistan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the use of methodological pluralism in Library and Information Science empirical research produced by Pakistani authors

Ullah¹,

Ameen²

2022

MJLIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Methodological pluralism or plurality is considered as the employment of more than one method in an inquiry. Methodological pluralism can be categorised into mixed methods and multi-method. The current study explored the use of methodological pluralism in Library and Information Science (LIS) research produced by Pakistani authors. Qualitative content analysis was used to explore latent and manifest use of methodologies in research articles authored by Pakistani published between 2001 and 2016 in national and international journals. Multiple searching strategies were used to identify the articles published in international journals. Findings show that high majority of Pakistani authors did not use the terms mixed methods and multi-method in the description of methodology. Nearly one third (30%) research articles used more than one method. The share of multi-method research (16%) is slightly higher than mixed methods research (14%). In multi-methods articles, combining of quantitative methods was less prevalent as compared to qualitative methods. Multi-method quantitative was used in only six articles. In case of multi-method qualitative design, interviews, personal communication and discussion with experts, literature review and content analysis are the most popular methods. In mixed methods research, interview and questionnaire are the most used methods. Growth in methodological pluralism is half than growth of articles with single method. Knowing and elaboration of the differentiation in mixed methods and multi-method can help in the education and use of methodological pluralism among LIS researchers. Authors should use and explore methodological plurality by treating multi-method designs as separate from mixed method designs.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the use of methodological pluralism in Library and Information Science empirical research produced by Pakistani authors

Ullah¹,

Ameen²

2022

MJLIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Analysis of publication patterns in Korean library and information science research

Yang

Lee

2012

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of research methods in LIS education: issues in Korean and U.S. universities

Park

2004

Library & Information Science Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent Trends in Research Methods in Library and Information Science : Content Analysis of the Journal Articles

Cited by 8 publications

References 3 publications

Examining the use of methodological pluralism in Library and Information Science empirical research produced by Pakistani authors

Examining the use of methodological pluralism in Library and Information Science empirical research produced by Pakistani authors

Analysis of publication patterns in Korean library and information science research

The study of research methods in LIS education: issues in Korean and U.S. universities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About