1998
DOI: 10.2307/1352838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Sedimentary Development of Tampa Bay, Florida: A Microtidal Estuary Incised into Tertiary Platform Carbonates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grand Bay is a retrograding relict river delta with little sediment supply, and sediment accumulation rates were low and comparable to other microtidal, low energy estuaries in the northern Gulf of Mexico region (Table ). Grand Bay sediment accumulation rates were similar to the Naples Bay estuary (Van Eaton et al ), Charlotte Harbor, Florida (Turner et al ), and Hillsborough Bay, a sediment‐starved Tampa Bay sub‐estuary (Brooks and Doyle ), but much lower than Tampa Bay proper (Santschi et al ) and Apalachicola Bay (Surratt et al ). Despite having similar sedimentation rates to open water sites (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Grand Bay is a retrograding relict river delta with little sediment supply, and sediment accumulation rates were low and comparable to other microtidal, low energy estuaries in the northern Gulf of Mexico region (Table ). Grand Bay sediment accumulation rates were similar to the Naples Bay estuary (Van Eaton et al ), Charlotte Harbor, Florida (Turner et al ), and Hillsborough Bay, a sediment‐starved Tampa Bay sub‐estuary (Brooks and Doyle ), but much lower than Tampa Bay proper (Santschi et al ) and Apalachicola Bay (Surratt et al ). Despite having similar sedimentation rates to open water sites (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Total annual precipitation in the region is 118 cm, 60% of which is received during the June-September rainy season (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1989). The city is on the southwestern flank of the Ocala Platform (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1989;Brooks & Doyle, 1998), and the soils are primarily derived from siliclastic materials of the Hawthorne geologic formation. The most prevalent soils across Tampa are hyperthermic, uncoated Lamellic Quartzipsamments, sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Aeric Alaquods, and sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Arenic Alaquods (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1989).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of cross-shelf continuity indicates that these sub-basins are not shelf valleys that have been carved by rivers during sea-level lowstands (Dalrymple et al, 1994;Donahue et al, 2003) in contrast to Brooks & Doyle's (1998) contention that the sub-basin beneath Tampa Bay was formed by palaeofl uvial incision. Numerous cores from Tampa Bay (US Army Corps of Engineers, 1969) as well as the surrounding onshore boreholes (Green et al, 1995;Florida Geological Survey, 2005) indicate that overlying the Arcadia Formation is the middle Miocene to lower Pliocene Peace River Formation, which constitutes the basin fi ll.…”
Section: Tampa Bay Sub-basinmentioning
confidence: 99%