2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent scientific/intellectual movements in biomedicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of techno-scientific progress has been intertwined with biomedical advances [47] and the organization of modern medicine [48] at least since the eighteenth century. Health innovations are now ubiquitous and range from targeted drugs in genomic medicine [49] to imaging technologies based on Artificial Intelligence [50]. Innovations are introduced in medical practices at such a high pace that some of them remain on the market for short periods of time, before they are replaced with the next wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of techno-scientific progress has been intertwined with biomedical advances [47] and the organization of modern medicine [48] at least since the eighteenth century. Health innovations are now ubiquitous and range from targeted drugs in genomic medicine [49] to imaging technologies based on Artificial Intelligence [50]. Innovations are introduced in medical practices at such a high pace that some of them remain on the market for short periods of time, before they are replaced with the next wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies such as these between social science and clinical research practices may be barriers discouraging collaboration between disciplines but further, exemplify the need for multidisciplinary teams. Furthermore, the predominance of evidence‐based medicine, a scientific/intellectual movement prioritizing the application of both clinical experience and scientific evidence, may de‐emphasize larger theoretical frameworks, and thus disincentivize collaboration between the basic and social sciences (Au, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While practitioners often speak of a paradigm (shift), commentators have characterized PM as a scientific/intellectual social movement (Juengst et al 2016;Au 2021), umbrella term (Pokorska-Bocci et al 2014, or socio-technical imaginary (Erikainen and Chan 2019;Strand 2022), among others. All these denominations bear value, depending on the question asked.…”
Section: Maintaining the Post-genomic Biomedical Imaginarymentioning
confidence: 99%