1987
DOI: 10.3133/pp1339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent reverse faulting in the Transverse Ranges, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of large recent historical earthquakes and associated published slip distributions on the Pitas Point, Ventura, or San Cayetano faults, data are limited to quantify the precise direction of fault slip during large earthquake ruptures on these faults. Many faults in the Ventura basin are thought to be oblique-reverse faults that include a significant component of left-lateral slip (Marshall et al, 2013;Sorlien et al, 2000;Yerkes et al, 1987). However, there is little geomorphological evidence, such as offset river channels or shutter ridges along either the Ventura, Southern San Cayetano, or San Cayetano faults to indicate a long-term component of strike-slip displacement on these faults (Hughes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of large recent historical earthquakes and associated published slip distributions on the Pitas Point, Ventura, or San Cayetano faults, data are limited to quantify the precise direction of fault slip during large earthquake ruptures on these faults. Many faults in the Ventura basin are thought to be oblique-reverse faults that include a significant component of left-lateral slip (Marshall et al, 2013;Sorlien et al, 2000;Yerkes et al, 1987). However, there is little geomorphological evidence, such as offset river channels or shutter ridges along either the Ventura, Southern San Cayetano, or San Cayetano faults to indicate a long-term component of strike-slip displacement on these faults (Hughes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%