1987
DOI: 10.1080/17442508708833440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress on the small parameter exit problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
97
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…using probabilistic arguments and they show that p may be written (2) p= [ <p(x)dP(x), 'ail where the probability measure P is supported by the set of minimizing points on dQ of the so-called quasi-potential function The proof relies on the large deviations principle. Recently Day [8] has given an exact formula for P, namely he has proved the following formula, given earlier by Matkowsky and Schuss [23], (j^.nRe-'I'ydj.nRe-'f, where R solves a linear first order equation (the main difficulty being to give a sense to this equation which coefficients are not smooth). We refer to [8] for the numerous historical developments about this problem, and we restrict ourself to the particular situation we are interested in, namely the PDE approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…using probabilistic arguments and they show that p may be written (2) p= [ <p(x)dP(x), 'ail where the probability measure P is supported by the set of minimizing points on dQ of the so-called quasi-potential function The proof relies on the large deviations principle. Recently Day [8] has given an exact formula for P, namely he has proved the following formula, given earlier by Matkowsky and Schuss [23], (j^.nRe-'I'ydj.nRe-'f, where R solves a linear first order equation (the main difficulty being to give a sense to this equation which coefficients are not smooth). We refer to [8] for the numerous historical developments about this problem, and we restrict ourself to the particular situation we are interested in, namely the PDE approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Day [8] has given an exact formula for P, namely he has proved the following formula, given earlier by Matkowsky and Schuss [23], (j^.nRe-'I'ydj.nRe-'f, where R solves a linear first order equation (the main difficulty being to give a sense to this equation which coefficients are not smooth). We refer to [8] for the numerous historical developments about this problem, and we restrict ourself to the particular situation we are interested in, namely the PDE approach. From a purely PDE point of view, Kamin [ 19] has proved that ue converges to a constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical rays in an inhomogeneous medium may focus, bounce off caustics, and cross one another. The same turns out to be true for optimal trajectories, if extended sufficiently far from an attractor [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The success of [25] prompted several efforts to put those results on a rigorous basis: [19], [6], [29]. These developments all assumed the nontangential case, n · b < 0.…”
Section: Boundary Local Time Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments all assumed the nontangential case, n · b < 0. In [5] the probabilistic approach of [6] was refined for use in the context of characteristic boundaries. This is the method we describe in this section.…”
Section: Boundary Local Time Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%