2020
DOI: 10.1002/elan.202060334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Progress of Single‐atom Catalysts in the Electrocatalytic Reduction of Oxygen to Hydrogen Peroxide

Abstract: Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have been attracting extensive interest in the electrocatalytic production of hydrogen peroxide by oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). This is due to the maximal efficiency of atom utilization and intimate interaction of the metal centers with the supporting matrix that may be exploited for deliberate manipulation of the electrocatalytic activity and selectiv-ity, in comparison with the conventional nanoparticle counterparts. Herein, we summarize recent progress of the design and engi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the volcano plots of the both are overlapped for the same rate-determining step when *OOH binds weakly. [404,405] As the inverse process of ORR reaction, the OER reaction produces the O 2 molecule from H 2 O involving the same electron transfer and intermediates (*OOH, *OH, and *O). Theoretically, the difference in Gibbs free energies between *OOH and *OH (ΔΔG = ΔG *OOH −-ΔG *OH ) is 2.46 eV, and the difference in Gibbs free energies between *O and *OH (ΔG *O −ΔG *OH ) is 1.23 eV for ideal OER catalyst, resulting in the overpotential of 0 V. Actually, due to the limitation of the scaling relation, [382] ΔΔG is typically approximate constant of 3.2 eV for metal oxides, and the η OER is almost solely dependent on (ΔG *O −ΔG *OH ) alone.…”
Section: Oxygen Reduction Reaction (Orr) and Oxygen Evolution Reaction (Oer)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the volcano plots of the both are overlapped for the same rate-determining step when *OOH binds weakly. [404,405] As the inverse process of ORR reaction, the OER reaction produces the O 2 molecule from H 2 O involving the same electron transfer and intermediates (*OOH, *OH, and *O). Theoretically, the difference in Gibbs free energies between *OOH and *OH (ΔΔG = ΔG *OOH −-ΔG *OH ) is 2.46 eV, and the difference in Gibbs free energies between *O and *OH (ΔG *O −ΔG *OH ) is 1.23 eV for ideal OER catalyst, resulting in the overpotential of 0 V. Actually, due to the limitation of the scaling relation, [382] ΔΔG is typically approximate constant of 3.2 eV for metal oxides, and the η OER is almost solely dependent on (ΔG *O −ΔG *OH ) alone.…”
Section: Oxygen Reduction Reaction (Orr) and Oxygen Evolution Reaction (Oer)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the volcano plots of the both are overlapped for the same rate‐determining step when *OOH binds weakly. [ 404,405 ]…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical production of H 2 O 2 mainly relies on the 2e − process of the ORR, with the reaction equations shown in eqn (24) and (25). 219 H 2 O 2 acts as a by-product in the 4e − reaction process of the ORR, and thus during the reaction process, the 4e − process needs to be inhibited. Therefore, it is very important to choose a suitable catalyst.In alkaline medium: O 2 + 2H 2 O + 2e − → H 2 O 2 + 2OH − Acidic medium: O 2 + 2H + + 2e − → H 2 O 2 An ideal electrochemical catalyst should be able to strongly adsorb O 2 to generate the oxygen-containing *OOH intermediate in the electrochemical synthesis of H 2 O 2 , and then the weak adsorption of *OOH on the surface of the catalyst can easily desorb and generate H 2 O 2 .…”
Section: Applications Of Fe-sacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When hydrogen peroxide is expected to be produced as a target molecule [34], the catalyst trends to be design following the two‐electron pathway. However, in most cases, the four‐electron mechanism is preferred, for it has higher energy efficiency and H 2 O 2 might be harmful to fuel cells.…”
Section: Machine Learning [13–15]mentioning
confidence: 99%