Recent progress in solid-phase microextraction and its pharmaceutical and biomedical applications

Kataoka, Hiroyuki; Ishizaki, Atsushi; Saito, Keita

doi:10.1039/c6ay00380j

Cited by 73 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 173 publications

(152 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This newly proposed approach was compared with the previously reported method, as listed in Table S1, and was proven able to provide superior detection sensitivity for trace-level analysis. Calculated from S/N = 3 1 and S/N = 10 2 ; From peak areas at 2 ng L −1 (n = 5) of each NSAID using the same tip 3 ; EF = the final concentration of analyte in the enriched extract/initial concentration of analyte in the sample solution 4 .…”

Section: Evaluation Of Analytical Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although classical extraction methods such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) are particularly preferred, the drawbacks often stated are the high running cost, high consumption of organic solvents and multistep separation techniques. In recent years, a range of advanced miniaturized solid-liquid extraction methods-such as solid phase microextraction (SPME) [1][2][3], micro-solid phase extraction (µ-SPE) [4,5], solid phase membrane tip extraction (SPMTE) [6,7], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [8], thin film microextraction (TFME) [9,10] and microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) [11]-have been proposed to reduce time as well as errors, leading to low consumption of the hazardous solvent and low cost.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mixed Matrix Membrane Tip Extraction Coupled with UPLC–MS/MS for the Monitoring of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Water Samples

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) method, in combination with a mixed matrix membrane microextraction method for the quantification of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in environmental water samples, is reported. The extraction device was prepared by casting well-dispersed polymeric bonded octadecyl (C18) particles in a cellulose triacetate matrix solution onto commercially available 200 μL micropipette tips. The membrane formed contains 25% of the adsorbent loading amount and was firmly attached to the inner wall of the membrane tip. The dynamic extraction was performed by withdrawing and dispensing the sample solution through the tip device for effective analyte adsorption, followed by the analyte desorption process into 40 μL of methanol and acetonitrile (1:1) prior to UPLC–MS/MS analysis. NSAIDs—namely diclofenac, ibuprofen, indoprofen, naproxen and sulindac—were chosen as targeted analytes. Several extraction parameters were comprehensively optimized, including sample pH value, ionic strength, dynamic extraction cycle, desorption solvent and desorption time. The optimized conditions demonstrated a linear range from 0.25 to 500 ng L−1, with correlation coefficients (r2) from 0.9988 to 0.9992 and detection limits ranging from 0.08 to 0.40 ng L−1. The recoveries of the spiked water samples were between 92% and 99% and exhibited excellent precision relative to standard deviations (RSDs ≤ 4.9%), and enrichment factors (EFs) were at 201–249 for the developed approach.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Of Analytical Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mixed Matrix Membrane Tip Extraction Coupled with UPLC–MS/MS for the Monitoring of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Water Samples

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Derivatization can be coupled with other extraction techniques, such as LLE (Nuhu, Basheer, & Saad, 2011), SPE (Y. Yang et al, 2015), SPME (Kataoka et al, 2016;Musteata & Musteata, 2009) and SBSE (Kawaguchi et al, 2006). Development of derivatization procedures should take into consideration additional aspects, such as kinetics, reaction yields, stability of products or even reaction mechanism of derivatization (McChesney-Harris, Kakodakar, Bernstein, & Stobaugh, 2013).…”

Section: Matrix Effect and Sample Preparationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sample preparation for large‐scale bioanalytical studies based on liquid chromatographic techniques

Medvedovici

Bacalum

David

2017

Biomedical Chromatography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality of the analytical data obtained for large-scale and long term bioanalytical studies based on liquid chromatography depends on a number of experimental factors including the choice of sample preparation method. This review discusses this tedious part of bioanalytical studies, applied to large-scale samples and using liquid chromatography coupled with different detector types as core analytical technique. The main sample preparation methods included in this paper are protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction, derivatization and their versions. They are discussed by analytical performances, fields of applications, advantages and disadvantages. The cited literature covers mainly the analytical achievements during the last decade, although several previous papers became more valuable in time and they are included in this review.

show abstract

“…We recently developed in-tube SPME methods, coupled with LC-MS/MS, to determine urinary concentrations of 8-IP [46] and 8-OHdG [47]. The details of the in-tube SPME technique and its applications have been summarized in several reviews [48][49][50]. This study describes our development of an automated online in-tube SPME-LC-MS/MS with negative/positive ion-switching ESI for simultaneous determination of 8-IP, 8-OHdG, and 3-NT in urine samples.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simultaneous analysis of multiple urinary biomarkers for the evaluation of oxidative stress by automated online in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction coupled with negative/positive ion‐switching mode liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Saito

Hamano

Kataoka

2018

J of Separation Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study described an automated online method for the simultaneous determination of 8-isoprostane, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, and 3-nitro-l-tyrosine in human urine. The method involves in-tube solid-phase microextraction using a Carboxen 1006 PLOT capillary column as an extraction device, followed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry using a CX column and detection in the negative/positive switching ion-mode by multiple reaction monitoring. Using their stable isotope-labeled internal standards, each of these oxidative stress biomarkers showed good linearity from 0.02 to 2.0 ng/mL. Their detection limits (S/N = 3) were 3.4-21.5 pg/mL, and their intra- and inter-day precisions (relative standard deviations) were >3.9 and 6.5% (n = 5), respectively. This method was applied successfully to the analysis of urine samples, without any other pretreatment and interference peaks.

show abstract

Recent progress in solid-phase microextraction and its pharmaceutical and biomedical applications

Abstract: Configurations of various devices for various SPME techniques.

Cited by 73 publications

References 173 publications

Mixed Matrix Membrane Tip Extraction Coupled with UPLC–MS/MS for the Monitoring of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Water Samples

Mixed Matrix Membrane Tip Extraction Coupled with UPLC–MS/MS for the Monitoring of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Water Samples

Sample preparation for large‐scale bioanalytical studies based on liquid chromatographic techniques

Simultaneous analysis of multiple urinary biomarkers for the evaluation of oxidative stress by automated online in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction coupled with negative/positive ion‐switching mode liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About