2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(02)01171-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in small specimen test technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research is currently ongoing to determine the best material choices for a number of plasma diagnostics. The technologies Table 1 Summary of some of the major fusion materials achievements accomplished within past 10 years [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Demonstrated via experiments and MD simulations that fusion defect production 'source term' is similar to that for fission (validates the use of fission reactors for initial testing and screening) [5] Provisional operating windows have been established for all three classes of reduced activation structural materials, based on radiation embrittlement, thermal creep, thermal conductivity, and void swelling considerations [6][7][8][9] (fusion-relevant He/dpa condition still to be probed) Fundamental procedures for fabricating and joining all three classes of structural materials have been established [5,[10][11][12] Development of miniaturized specimen test techniques: evolution from qualitative screening guide to quantitative data generation [5,[13][14][15] Application of Master Curve technique to unify fracture data obtained on different specimen geometries, strain rate, constraint factor, etc. [16] Operating limits for irradiated Cu alloys defined [9,17,18] Determined that permanent radiation-included electrical degradation is not of significant concern for ceramic insulators in next-step machines such as ITER [19,…”
Section: Overview Of 25 Years Of Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research is currently ongoing to determine the best material choices for a number of plasma diagnostics. The technologies Table 1 Summary of some of the major fusion materials achievements accomplished within past 10 years [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Demonstrated via experiments and MD simulations that fusion defect production 'source term' is similar to that for fission (validates the use of fission reactors for initial testing and screening) [5] Provisional operating windows have been established for all three classes of reduced activation structural materials, based on radiation embrittlement, thermal creep, thermal conductivity, and void swelling considerations [6][7][8][9] (fusion-relevant He/dpa condition still to be probed) Fundamental procedures for fabricating and joining all three classes of structural materials have been established [5,[10][11][12] Development of miniaturized specimen test techniques: evolution from qualitative screening guide to quantitative data generation [5,[13][14][15] Application of Master Curve technique to unify fracture data obtained on different specimen geometries, strain rate, constraint factor, etc. [16] Operating limits for irradiated Cu alloys defined [9,17,18] Determined that permanent radiation-included electrical degradation is not of significant concern for ceramic insulators in next-step machines such as ITER [19,…”
Section: Overview Of 25 Years Of Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Operating limits for irradiated Cu alloys defined [9,17,18] Determined that permanent radiation-included electrical degradation is not of significant concern for ceramic insulators in next-step machines such as ITER [19,20] Developed radiation-resistant SiC/SiC composites, based on fundamental information obtained from systematic studies on irradiated fibers, monolithic SiC, and SiC composites [21,22] for fabricating complex, reactor-relevant scale components and the experience obtained from operations in ITER will provide a strong foundation from which to build toward Demo. Table 1 summarizes some of the major fusion materials achievements accomplished within the past 10 years, encompassing both fundamental and applied research [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The ITER-specific accomplishments summarized in the preceding paragraphs are not included in Table 1.…”
Section: Overview Of 25 Years Of Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of Small Specimen Testing Technologies (SSTT) is of essential importance in a view of qualification of irradiated structural materials for future fusion power plants [1]. The key SSTT criteria are reduced specimen size and reliably scalable experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many different techniques using small specimens have been developed to assess the mechanical response of materials after irradiation. These tests include: tension, fatigue, Charpy impact, creep and stress corrosion cracking experiments as well as non-standard tests [50]. In the following, the discussion is restricted to the current development of one test technique for ultra-small specimens, which has the potential to extract the constitutive behaviour precisely.…”
Section: Small Specimen Test Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%