“…The accumulation of the SEI layer,w hich not only increased the electrode resistance but also decreased the number of electroactives ites, led to the capacity fading.I nc ontrast, the adhesive and dispersant nature of NaCMC, [11] when mixed with NaPAA, improved the wetting and spreading of the binder on the active particles urface. [16,70,71] Figure S11c ompares the surfacea ppearances of the electrodes after 300 charge-discharge cycles.F or the PVDF electrode, some of the Cu substrate was exposed (owing to the detachment of the active material layer), whereas the NaCMC/NaPAA electrode retained the bestm echanical integrity.T he corresponding electrode morphologies examined using SEM are shown in Figure 6. After 150 cycles,t he capacity retentionr atios were 56 %, 64 %, 66 %, and 73 %f or the PVDF,N aCMC, NaPAA, and NaCMC/NaPAA electrodes, respectively.T he decreased durability at ah igh sodiation-desodiation rate suggested that the electrode volume expansion/shrinkage, rather than other parasitic reactions, was mainly responsible for the capacity decay.Agood binder,e ven thoughi ta ccountsf or only as mall portion of the electrode, plays as ignificant role in cycling stability, especially under high-rate operation.…”