Recent Progress in Raspberry Breeding at East Malling

Keep, Elizabeth; Parker, Jill H.; Knight, V.H.

doi:10.17660/actahortic.1980.112.15

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…cinerea. This is true of gene H (Knight & Keep, 1958a;Jennings, 1962), Malling 1473/35 (Keep, Parker & Knight, 1980), Rubus coreanus Miq. (Keep, Knight & Parker, 1977), and Rubus occidentalis L. (Converse, 1966).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Resistance to Didymella applanata in red raspberry and some related species

Jennings

1982

Annals of Applied Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

S U M M A R YWhen raspberry canes were inoculated in summer with a mycelial inoculum of Didymella applanata resistant genotypes developed relatively small lesions which produced few fruiting bodies in the following spring. Scores of the frequency of these fruiting bodies provided the best discrimination between genotypes. Very strong resistance was found in R . pileatus, R. occidentalis and R . coreanus and in hybrids of these species with red raspberry. Hybrids with R . crataegfolius were less resistant. Resistance was also found in Malling 1473/35, a derivative of red raspberry cv. Chief, and in red raspberry segregates with gene H which determines cane pubescence. Both the expression of resistance and the ranking of resistance sources for their resistance was similar for D. applanata to that reported for Botrytis cinerea.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Keep, Knight & Parker, 1977), and Rubus occidentalis L. (Converse, 1966). Thus by selecting for cane health breeders have obtained resistance to both diseases (Keep, Parker & Knight, 1980). Indeed, R .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance to Didymella applanata in red raspberry and some related species

Jennings

1982

Annals of Applied Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…have been considered as sources of resistance to the raspberry beetle (Keep 1976;Keep et al 1980;Briggs et al 1982;Finn & Hancock 2008). Their derivatives and the purple raspberry cultivar Glen Coe (Jennings et al 2003) and also primocane raspberry cultivars (Jennings et al 1991) have all shown some level of resistance to larvae-induced damage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Damage by the raspberry beetle (Byturus tomentosusDe Geer) in different raspberry cultivars

Arus

Kikas

Kaldmäe

et al. 2013

Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Growing cultivars less susceptible to raspberry beetles (Byturus tomentosus De Geer) reduces the need for chemical control and therefore has a great impact on environmentally friendly raspberry production. To determine the susceptibility of raspberry cultivars to raspberry beetles, larvae-induced damage to raspberry cultivars from the collection of the Polli Horticultural Research Centre of the Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia was determined during the years 2003-2011. A total of 17 cultivars were assessed: Aita, Alvi, Herbert, Ivars, Novokitaivska, Preussen, Tomo, Algonquine, Ottawa, Haida, Helkal, Glen Ample, Glen Magna, Glen Rosa, Nagrada, Norna and Veten. The early-flowering cultivars were significantly more damaged than the late-flowering cultivars. The most damaged cultivars were Ivars and Novokitaivska. The lowest damage occurred in the late-flowering cultivars Glen Ample and Glen Magna. Late-flowering cultivars are phenologically more isolated from the raspberry beetle. Growing late-flowering and less-susceptible cultivars is a promising alternative to minimise raspberry beetle-induced damage in integrated pest management and organic farming systems.

show abstract