2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-013-4890-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in quantifying substituent effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compound b The values were taken from Hansh et al [27] c The values were taken from previous studies. [28][29][30][31][32][33] d Indicator variable of 4′-OH.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compound b The values were taken from Hansh et al [27] c The values were taken from previous studies. [28][29][30][31][32][33] d Indicator variable of 4′-OH.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The σ α values are calculated by quantum‐chemical methods, normalized to the σ I , σ R , σ R + , and σ R − constants of substituents X, and tabulated for many X . (A somewhat different approach to the problem of polarizability effect is taken by Cao …”
Section: Calculation Procudurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] (A somewhat different approach to the problem of polarizability effect is taken by Cao. [33,34] ) In non-classic series XBR C q and XR C q , the substituent X and the charged center R C q are spaced closely. This can give rise to the steric effect.…”
Section: Calculation Procudurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two sets of trends were observed. The first trend showed that, for each metal, as the estimated electronegativity [26][27][28][29] of the monodentate ligands increased, the M-C bond lengths tended to decrease. The M-L bond lengths did not follow this trend (Table 3), but as the monodentate ligands are not as geometrically constrained, their modeled bond lengths may be less rigorously predicted.…”
Section: Effect Of Monodentate Ligandmentioning
confidence: 99%